Boards›Teamfight Tactics

Comparisons using 1g to 1 item are stupid and don't make any sense

Kuponya·7/20/2019, 8:50:42 PM·3 votes·493 views

People are expecting that RNG will always favour them and grant them 3 items in the first 3 rounds. Key word here being "favour".

What a fair comparison should be based on is the average expected items you are to get, not outliers. Comparing outliers is not reasonable as it is not proven that 3 is the max amount of items possible from the first 3 rounds.

It is more likely that 1 - 2 items is the average items one should expect. In that case the comparison based on the scenarios should be rather an item is worth 5g/2g respectively.

2 Comments

TwitchInMyPants7/20/2019, 9:09:02 PM1 votes

1g =/= 1 item, 2 items, or 3 items

Its inferior to all of them. That's the core of the complaint. Hell even 5 gold has difficulty matching it, even if you're guaranteed 9 if you fail to get money every round its not going to match 3-9 items. Gold can upgrade units/levels but you're guaranteed nothing wheras items you can control their RNG somewhat through carosel and items always combine with other items, you can usually make items that are useful.