First of all, no. There are hermaphrodites which are incredibly rare congenital defects. These are not "pretty often" occurrences, these are , last I checked, less than 0.01% of births.
If you ask experts at medical centers how often a child is born so noticeably atypical in terms of genitalia that a specialist in sex differentiation is called in, the number comes out to about 1 in 1500 to 1 in 2000 births. But a lot more people than that are born with subtler forms of sex anatomy variations, some of which won’t show up until later in life.
Given the size of the world's population and the regularity of births, that's still "Pretty Often." It's likely happening somewhere in the world every day, and if not that - at least every week. This is especially true when you consider that the places with the highest birth rates are ones that have less medical aid, and also exposed to worse conditions which can have an effect on growth in the womb.
Also, I've never heard anyone who isn't an ancient fossil refer to genital anomalies or intersex conditions as 'hermaphrodites', this doesn't even make sense because a proper hermaphrodite does not exist in the human species.
Uhh, have you ever read a medical textbook on embryology? you have zero clue. Not only is what you said wrong, it is apocalyptically wrong, you'd be laughed out of a classroom if you argued such nonsense.
And we're all so grateful to you for telling us we're wrong without explaining the validity of your argument. "Embryology lol" "Has the weight of history and 50 years lol" are not valid arguments, and you would be "Laughed out of the class" for framing your argument that way.
Hormones are not what you think they are.
I think hormones are chemical messengers carried through the body's blood stream that instruct the body to carry out certain bodily functions and developments, including when it's time to start puberty, which sexual characteristics emerge, and the forming of a foreskin and penis in the womb.
What did you think I think hormones are, and explain to me how this is wrong, please.
2- Embryological development (In the way we are describing) is due to chromosomal make-up, not by hormones. Hormones have NOTHING to do with sex.
They just instigate or fail to instigate the physical changes we use to determine sex at birth and in adolescence. I fail to see how my point that sex is a messy not black and white subject is invalidated. Though I'm sure XX IS FEMALE XY IS MALE is a handy way to keep your view of biology simple. Right up there with 'femaleness is defined by its ability to give birth'.
3- ZAC seems to be male by all accounts. The thread was over awhile ago.
Oh good then I guess your position is beyond reproach because thread is over, nothing to see here folks.
Sure, tell that to every medical textbook on embryology ever published. LOL.
Or you could be less obnoxious and defend your position with reasons instead of just saying "Sex is XX/XY this I know, for my textbook tells me so."