Morality, Good and Evil

I think LoL should have more clearly define morality of champions. As a image above suggest, we can split all champions into these groups and then group them together into three main groups:

Good and possibly good: lawful good, social good, neutral good, rebel good, chaotic good, lawful moral, social moral, neutral moral, rebel moral, lawful neutral, social neutral, true neutral, rebel neutral.

Neutral and possibly neutral: neutral moral, rebel moral, chaotic moral, lawful neutral, social neutral, true neutral, rebel neutral, chaotic neutral, lawful impure, social impure, neutral impure.

Evil and possibly evil: chaotic neutral, lawful impure, social impure, neutral impure, rebel impure, chaotic impure, lawful evil, social evil, neutral evil, rebel evil, chaotic evil.

As for now, many champions don't have morality. Usually, it is hinted or suggested, what morality they follow, but nothing much is beyond that.

Also, while it might not stick with everybody, clearly defining heroes and villains would be nice. Who is now clearly doing evil deeds, plotting, scheming and is current threat to Runeterra, and who is clearly fighting against these threats.

For example: should be major villain in Runeterra, being one the most dangerous threats, yet he almost don't exists in the lore and have no opposition ( could be called an opposition, but they never clashed against each other and pretty much doesn't know anything about each other; only thing they have between them is that they are enemies to each other).