"He's not feeding, he's just bad"
No, he's running into the middle of the lane in a 1v2 while being 4 levels behind and a score of 0/7/0. It's feeding.
No, he's running into the middle of the lane in a 1v2 while being 4 levels behind and a score of 0/7/0. It's feeding.
You mean inting right? Because feeding simply means dying over and over (According to boards, the Yasuo on your team, but never the one on the opposing team). What you are describing is people that are purposely dying, which is labelled as 'int feeding'. Feeding=/=inting (in most cases).
It's still a really hard thing to prove. It's when they have a history of it or they verbalize their intent to feed is when it becomes intentional punishable. Edited.
Not having a history of intentional feeding doesn't mean they aren't intentionally feeding. if you are purposefully running into the middle of the enemy team over and over again even though you have died every time, you're feeding.
But then all the Yasuo, Vayne and Yi players would get permabanned : ^) kappa
you forgot the riven, zed, and lee players
Tank players also being added to that list, as unless they snowball literally 90% of their job is "take hits/deaths for carries".
No argument with that. I was describing factors that effect whether a punishment was meted out. What you've described sounds pretty intentional, so maybe they'll get punished.
ya hes feeding.
intentionally though? who knows.
Keep in mind that feeding alone isn't punishable.
How could you have a history of it if you could never prove it because there was no history of it :Thinking:
No no no, i'm a retard on the boards/a rioter and i can tell you that was just a bad game™ no intentionality whatsoever in his actions, if you disagree with me you're a toxic racist bitter noob that would have otherwise won if you were just better at the game.