[{quoted}](name=Arcade Andrew,realm=NA,application-id=cIfEodbz,discussion-id=jIg8mFGE,comment-id=00010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2015-05-23T05:27:37.956+0000)
did you even read the second part of this of WHY it cant learn context (besides it being a machine and not a human programed to key in on certain phrases)
it cant learn context because if you let the community set the rules of whats toxic, context is always changing, one day gg easy might be an honorable thing to say, and ggwp will be toxic, you never know
for example in china/korea "silver trash" is a toxic phrase but in NA "silver trash" isnt, it falls under neutral behaviour
That's not what context means. I think that's what you're misunderstanding.
Context means either the words surrounding the statement, or the circumstances in which the statement was said. If taken out of context, "kill yourself" is a negative phrase. In the context of someone saying "if you don't get some lifesteal you will kill yourself on his Thornmail", it is not negative at all. If you ignore the context, you can't tell whether it's bad or not. If you pay attention to the context, you can tell. This program pays attention to the context. If it needs to figure out whether something is negative, it can look back through every game where anyone has ever said "kill yourself" in any context, and look for a pattern. For example, if "kill" and "___self" and "Thornmail" are said together, the player never gets immediately muted by other players and they rarely get reported. From that, it realizes that that is a context in which you can say that phrase.
No matter how much you insist, it is not "programmed to key in on certain phrases". That's not what they're doing. Okay, you're familiar with Google, right? Back in 2007, what would happen if you typed the phrase "hunger games" into Google? It would bring up some sites about hunger, and about games, and maybe dieting or games about eating. A year later, if you searched for that term, it would pull up nothing but pages related to the novel The Hunger Games. How did that happen? Did someone at Google reprogram their search so that it would understand that Hunger + Games together means the person is definitely searching for information about that book? No! The search engine paid attention to what people were clicking on after they searched. It noticed very quickly that a.) there are suddenly 10000x as many searches that have the phrase "hunger games" in them, and b.) all of those searches are clicking on pages that include the words "suzanne", "collins", "novel", "book", "katniss", and so on. Not a single Google employee took the time to fix Google so that it would understand this. Since it is paying attention to the behavior of everyone who uses it, it catches on very quickly when the relevance or meaning of a phrase changes.
No one programmed this bot to punish people for saying "GG easy". It looked at chat logs for more games than you or I can possibly imagine, and came to that realization on its own by just looking at patterns. If the playerbase drastically changes their mind on something, this algorithm will also change its mind.