Guy wants to play Bard, we ban bard, he intentionally feeds because we banned Bard.
yup
Edit: since none of you are understanding, he never asked us to not ban bard. our banner banned him before the guy even mentioned it.
yup
Edit: since none of you are understanding, he never asked us to not ban bard. our banner banned him before the guy even mentioned it.
Well, intentionally feeding is never excusable, but I can't really side on you as well.
It's like when I tell them I prefer top and that I main Irelia and they ban her, still not sure why.
I always ask if there are any bard mains so I can swap with them. If yes, I ban him.
[{quoted}](name=Cpt Lemmiwinks,realm=NA,application-id=cIfEodbz,discussion-id=J2EEApgo,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-03-20T19:50:38.625+0000)
I always ask if there are any bard mains so I can swap with them. If yes, I ban him.
Bazinga.
And then 3 months from now someone picks Bard at the LCS and you'll be crying on the forums that he's OP.
And then 3 months from now someone picks Bard at the LCS and you'll be crying on the forums that he's OP.
I didn't ban him, and I don't care if pros pick him up. 99% of Bards suck at the moment.
Which is more troll:
Wanting to play a new champ, but not being good because he is new and has a high skill cap.
OR
Banning a new champ because someone wants to play him and you think it is bad.
Which is more troll:
Wanting to play a new champ, but not being good because he is new and has a high skill cap.
OR
Banning a new champ because someone wants to play him and you think it is bad.
Honestly, Riot should implement a 2-3 week restriction on new champs in ranked play. Force people to play normals if they want to play something completely new and give Riot time to balance them before they show up in ranked.
Honestly, Riot should implement a 2-3 week restriction on new champs in ranked play. Force people to play normals if they want to play something completely new and give Riot time to balance them before they show up in ranked.
Be that as it may, I was talking about something different.
Be that as it may, I was talking about something different.
ah, but we can talk about the problem... or we could solve the problem.
When I played, I banned EVERY new champ for the first 3 weeks after it came out. Without fail, if I had control of bans, new champs were on my banlist.
The problem is that new champs are frequently imbalanced one way or another AND people suck with them usually. So why not ban them...?
ah, but we can talk about the problem... or we could solve the problem.
When I played, I banned EVERY new champ for the first 3 weeks after it came out. Without fail, if I had control of bans, new champs were on my banlist.
The problem is that new champs are frequently imbalanced one way or another AND people suck with them usually. So why not ban them...?
I'm talking about motivations. Not about Pick/Ban strategies.
Banning a new champ due to questionably skilled random people and the newness of a champ is fine.
Banning a champ because someone explicitly expressed a want to play them is a troll move and makes you a toxic player.
That was my point.
Honestly, Riot should implement a 2-3 week restriction on new champs in ranked play. Force people to play normals if they want to play something completely new and give Riot time to balance them before they show up in ranked.
Yes.
HOWEVER, that will never happen. It would kill revenue from new champs.