You're still not understanding my comments. You really should learn to read and understand what people are saying before you reply to them.
1 There is no official rules difference between normal and ranked the are the same.
(if you disagree post a link to where riot has said other wise)
Ah the old "I'm right unless you prove me wrong" argument. I'm sure you were the star of your school's debate team. You state that ranked games are not competitive, yet you offer no evidence to support this claim. An absence of a comment from Riot affirming that ranked is competitive is not direct evidence to prove that ranked is not competitive. Let me ask you something. Can you find a link to a Riot post stating that ranked games are not competitive? Because unless you can, saying that ranked games are not more competitive than normal games is a baseless statement. The simple fact that Ranked queues have an elo ranking and end of season rewards, whereas normals have nothing is a clear enough indication that ranked is meant to be more competitive than normals. You are claiming that ranked and normals are not different, which makes no logical sense. If they were not different then what is the point in ranked existing. If you don't believe that to be true, please provide a Riot source that states that ranked is not competitive. In this case, the burden of proof is on you, not me.
This is supported by the fact that if riot releases " champ x" and i buy "champ x" the minute she was released i can go in to a >ranked game to try them out and play her on any lane i want.
So you see the simple act of buying sona and trying her out top lane for the first time in ranked is not being a troll.
That is perfectly acceptable there are no rules against that .
I know that this is true. I know that Riot is OK with people doing this. I never said they weren't. Please, for God's sake, learn to fucking read. I only said that this kind of behaviour should be discouraged in order to make ranked a better experience for competitive players. Do you know what the word "should" means? In this context it is referring to something that I believe needs to be there, but isn't. Not a single sentence you wrote actually responds to anything I wrote. You call me a broken record, but every one of your posts is just "fuk meta sheep, Riot says we can play whatever we want".
The simple act of playing sona top lane for the very first time in ranked is not necessarily trolling. It becomes trolling when you pick sona top knowing that you will play poorly with the intent of "getting back" at your teammates for forcing you to go top when you didn't want to. And when you are 0/7 in lane (just as you expected from the moment you locked in sona) and your teammates start bitching at you, you just trow out the old "off meta" excuse and claim that you aren't doing anything wrong.
unless in extreme cases of abuse where the person has specifically made their "intent" is clear.
Like I have said before (again, learn to read people's comments before replying to them) these extreme cases are just that: extreme cases. It's very rare to see a person in ranked continually walk into the enemy team and die. 99% of all trolling is done in very subtle ways and comes with no consequences. If I feel like trolling a game I don't have to walk into the enemy team and die. I can instalock first time sona top, go 0/7 in lane, and then hide behind the excuse "Going off meta isn't reportable, I'm having a bad game". I just intentionally trolled my team with 0 consequences. Something has to be done about this kind of behaviour because it happens all the time. Almost every game I see it, either on my team or the enemy's. Going off meta shouldn't be punished. People who use "going off meta" as a thin veiled excuse for trolling should be punished. But they aren't. And that needs to stop.
another broken record ....your getting tedious to.
You should also learn how to spell. And properly learn to get a point across.
Every single one of your arguments is "Riot didn't officially state it, therefore it's not true". If you don't see the logical fallacies with this kind of arguing then you probably shouldn't even have access to a computer, you'll end up electrocuting yourself trying to plug the charger in.