Change "unskilled player" to "unskilled/overskilled player" to fix matchmaking
For all those smurfs abusing weaker players, or plain mistakes by matchmaking system.
27 Comments
I would just like to add...that being a smurf gives you virtually NO advantage when you're playing with low elo players. I say this because I recently started a smurf account where my runes and masteries were reset back to 0...If anything I have LESS attack damage then the average player because I'm too lazy to 'experiment' with my runes because i already have 4 full rune pages on my other account...with that being said...I can hit my skill shots better and perhaps calculate my approximate death when 1v1ing a laner better then the average noob BUT...I'll be honest, the noobs kick my ass sometimes and I was placed into silver out of my promos last season when i started...at noob level they put me at silver...please...dont report/blame the smurfs for being smurfs....they just have a little better calculation then you and THATS IT. and that will come with practice. I've been playing for 2 years now. lol. dont rage at the smurfs
Ummm yeah.... I was playing the other day and twice I was matched with someone who wasn't even level 30 yet and I felt kind of bad.
Isn't playing against a smurf a good thing? Forgive me, but I'm just putting out my opinion. It would be nice to play with a smurf. You'd learn how to fight against a better and more skilled player instead of fighting against players that have the same skill level as you where you would probably learn nothing. I really don't mind playing against smurfs since I do learn from them, but I can understand that it would be unfair to have a high skilled player against your team.
Lmfao. I dont understand riot's matchmaking system at all. I genuinely belive that i play at a higher level than the elo im at. http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1853774948/47131763?tab=builds. I'm only silver 4 nd i dont think they should move me to diamond or anything, but i do believe they need to look at how they rank players. Instead of determining rank (for solo Q) by wins, it should be determined by in game stats. like farm, objectives taken, deaths, and kills etc.. i dont always go 32/3 with 
, but i do paly really well and get good grades (from the grader thing in the after game menu) averaging from A- to S+. like wtf why am i getitng matched with ppl who dont know what they are doing.... can anyone explain to me why?
its a good idea but it wouldn't work right. the game is too snowbally. i have gone 19-1 and then 0-7 the very next game in ranked. so i guess i should be reported overskilled then unskilled on the next one?
So 5 people will be reporting the other 5 people every game? And the point of this is.....? Because obviously five people are more skilled than the other five because they won and the other guys lost... logic, right? Sounds like reporting for reports sake because reports...
Isn't unskilled player just a placebo report
I honestly don't think that option does anything to start with and to be honest would be better if we just get teambuilders minor per role adjustment. For example if I play almost all my games jungle, some of my games support and mid but im forced to top lane and I do poorly, does that make me unskilled overall? Probably not, just makes me unskilled at one role.
Same with overskilled, you might think im smurfing but in reality im just playing my best champion
Plot twist: "Unskilled" doesn't work in ranked.
I think the Unskilled Player report is more for catching ELO boosters than anything. If someone is in Diamond then consistently loses 90% of their games, it's very clear what happened.