I don't think Dunkey deserves an excuse but...

However, I will ask. Where do we draw the line? I know toxicity is unacceptable. But what about other players who intentionally troll? We're just going to let them slip by because they don't have enough reports? I actually don't understand what's the reasoning behind that.

I honestly think if their is evidence that somebody intentionally trolled one game. They should get banned for the week. Since toxicity takes multiple times for 2 weeks.

Is this just me? I think intentionally feeding is a little less common than a toxic person, but an intentionally feeding guy ruins the game literally makes it nearly impossible to win. It makes the chances extremely unfair to win a game. Sure a toxic guy doesn't get a free pass either, because neither of them are doing the right thing, but one can usually get away scot-free, and the other one will face punishments.

Also, don't you think people like Dunkey encountered many of these people not because he's toxic, but because he's a famous League player. I can only assume that he's toxic because he gets multiple people that try to intentionally throw his games.

EDIT: What's messed up about this system of how the intentional feeders get away with this is that it's almost like saying this. "We won't send you to jail this time, but if you shoot 2 more people next time. We'll put you in jail." It just makes no sense. It's just completely flawed in that aspect.