When playing ADC, I prefer the support not be able to 100-0 with no counterplay

Nucleophilic atk·Feb 14, 2015·2 votes·322 views

You nerf Sona because "she does too much damage" but at least she couldn't stun and 100-0 you.

7 Comments

Raja ChachkiFeb 14, 20155 votes

Annie is not a support. She is a burst mage, who is being played with support because of her high base damage, that continues to scale into late game. If anything, she just needs an "uptime" on her stun. For example, I am Annie. I have just cast 4 spells so my stun is up. Now I have 15 seconds(random time) to cast a stunning spell, or else it goes away.

Also, since this change will not be implemented, think on the bright side. When Annie has her stun up, she can no longer poke you with Q's unless she wants to waste her stun. :)

Nucleophilic atkFeb 14, 20151 votes

This is actually a good idea. I'm also in favor of reducing the base damage for higher AP scales. It's also them damn AAs that hit like tanks lol.

disregardableFeb 14, 20151 votes

You realize her stun has a visible indicator? You realize Tibbers has a 120/100/80 second cooldown, so if you haven't seen the bear in 2 minutes her ult is up?

Okay, problem solved.

Nucleophilic atkFeb 14, 20151 votes

Yes, a visible indicator that means you better run to your turret or you're going to die. Not too mention that good Annie supports won't sit there with their stun indicator on. The will have 3 spells and spam 2 for the stun. The more ya know.

redniwediSFeb 14, 20151 votes

I can't actually tell if the idea behind this thread is to say Sona shouldn't have been nerfed, or if it's to say they should have nerfed Annie instead.

Nucleophilic atkFeb 14, 20151 votes

Lol, Sona def shouldn't have been nerfed. But, I don't think Annie needs nerfed. Just tweaked a bit so that she can't 100-0 ADCs with basically no AP items lol.