Skip to content

[POLL] Should Cleanse remove Grievous Wounds?

darkdill··12 votes·624 views

Heal lost the ability to remove GW in patch 4.7, so now the only means of countering GW is to get QSS. Since GW is virtually a CC, shouldn't it be removeable by Cleanse? It'd make sense.

(Before you say "it removes Ignite", that's only the damage portion, not the healing reduction.)

9 Comments

IIllIIlIIlIIllI4 votes

It's a bit wierd it cleanses off the dmg component of summoner 14 and not grievous wounds ><

ÑathaÑ3 votes

I second this notion

urmomcalled2 votes

I agree. It just makes sense of what cleanse is supposed to be. It's supposed to clean you off and get everything off you. Grevious Wounds included.

Binxy Prime1 votes

im pretty sure it does though.

darkdill1 votes

It doesn't ATM.

Proxyminers1 votes

Heal used to but they said no more of that as heal was being used by everyone because of how good it was doing.

Right now, nothing can get rid of that effect.

Proxyminers1 votes

The question that should be asked is: Should Cleanse remove all Effects and CC?

Personally I believe that cleanse should remove all effects and the Items that remove stuff should be what cleanse is today.

I find it stupid that the Summoner has weaker powers than items in a game where SS make and break games more than items.

darkdill2 votes

Cleanse was specifically made to be ineffective against suppression and other various negative debuffs to allow Champions like Mordekaiser, Malzahar, etc., to be viable. If Cleanse broke those effects, that'd be seriously OP.

Rhyto1 votes

Hmm, seeing summoner 1 used more would certainly be something, especially since with the new icon. I wouldn't mind seeing this change.

More from Live Gameplay Balance

More by darkdill