Cause it sure doesn't draw many people's interest to by as it currently is.
It would be a passive named tenacity so it would not stack with merc trreads
Also make Merc treads have 35% again so it is not a case of being like when cloak and dagger had 25% while merc treads had 35%.
P Z1 votesIt doesn't seem to be chosen very often, but looking at the overall package I wonder why that is. For the low, low price of 2,650g, you get:
300 Health 50 Armor 10% Cooldown Reduction 150% Health Regeneration Tower Disable for three seconds Up to +20% movement speed near turrets, fallen turrets and void gates
It creates opportunities on offense for obvious reasons, but also defensively with that +20% movement speed making you much harder to finish off if you just need a quick wave clear while at a disadvantage.
Build path isn't half-bad either. Clearly I should consider Ohmwrecker more often.
Irelia Bot1 votesDoesn't really match the champ you tend to play though.
DeathBurst1 votesIt has one big selling point, it's the only Armor+HP item with CDR. But really, the problem is not that Ohmwrecker is bad in absolute, it's that it's worse than the other Armor+HP item. CDR aside, why would you buy an Ohmwrecker instead of a Deadman's? And if you like the MS around turrets, well, ZZrot has a better active.
LyingOnLine1 votesThen people would be buying it for the Tenacity, instead of the irrelevant active. And at that point you might as well remove the active and use that power budget somewhere else, and by that point you have an entirely different item.
Irelia Bot1 votesIt isn't like the current power budget is actually seen as worthwhile.
LyingOnLine2 votesI don't disagree.
I'm just saying you might as well be asking for major defensive item with 35% Tenacity.
sit kid1 votesMerc treads don't deserve buff