Smurfs in low ELO is a massive problem stemming from ranked being badly designed

fountainAFK·8/6/2019, 3:35:38 PM·4 votes·1,254 views

I'm not silver (as can be seen on my op.gg, but this acc was placed in silver 4 after my promotion games. And this is a problem.

Did the system really think I was silver? Probably not.

I'm just one person but this happens to a lot of people smurfing, they get placed very far from where they belong. This results in your average silver game getting stacked with people that are everything from low gold to masters+ (and then a few players that probably should have been placed in bronze/iron). This makes climbing in silver a nightmare and a roll of dice. "Did matchmaking favour you with more and better smurfs" becomes the question as you struggle to climb.

This is just an anecdote but winning in silver was much harder for me than winning games in plat/gold games has been so far on this account. I don't recall the exact number but I think I were stacking a low 53-54% win rate in silver because I was going up against so many smurfs that seemed to be diamond 1 or something, and they just snowballed like crazy in mid/top. Then when I got to plat game became much easier. And win rates went up to like 59-60%.

I think the "smurf problem" where smurfs can single-handedly decide a lot of games sucks for low ELO's trying to make an honest climb. I think the problem comes from how the ranked system insists on placing high ELO smurfs in ranks they CLEARLY don't belong to. If say an adc is packing 10 cs/min while dishing out most damage, don't place that person silver, if a player in normal's always get's matched with diamonds, don't place that player silver, because they are not silver - and you know it.

I also don't like how the system is making it so hard for smurfs to climb. Some days ago I saw a silver 2 player with like 90% winrate get matched against me on this acc. I stomped this player during a promotion, but was this really fair to them? To "prove" they deserved to go from silver 2 to silver 1 they had to beat a team of all plat. This person was clearly not silver and the ranked system knew it too, yet the system does all in its power to keep them silver for longer and make their climb super challenging by having their promos in silver be against plat.

The ranked system should IMO be nicer to smurf accounts and just let them climb faster/easier so they can stop making silver/gold/plat games such a dice roll

9 Comments

DuskDaUmbreon8/6/2019, 3:57:52 PM2 votes

How tf are they supposed to change it for when you're freshly placed? They can't just throw you right into diamond because you stomped.

Eybdoog8/6/2019, 6:12:21 PM2 votes

You are 100% correct. This has been a serious problem for me and everyone just told me to shut up and “git good”. I eventually just stopped playing because as I got better I started realizing games were actual coin flips and my skill was irrelevant most of the time

EY3 Tyr4nT8/7/2019, 7:39:14 AM2 votes

yea the shit gets old with smurfs in a lot of the games but its not going to ever stop so no point getting too upset about it,it just makes me not take ranked all that serious.as its a coinflip every game which team got the plat smurf.after the games we win cause of them they always have this shit attitude like we should be grateful they were there to carry the game but i always tell em go lose in their own elo and stop messing ours up so badly.

22 Caliber Rifle8/6/2019, 4:01:07 PM1 votes

When I tell people I have a smurf account, they all laugh and suggest that i was boosted.... but its quite the opposite. Its kinda embarrassing that my smurf is a higher rank then my main and the reason behind that is bc of low MMR issues and other problems that happen in game (mostly out of my control).

BTW:

  • Main acc - Gold IV 46% w/r
  • Smurf acc - Plat II 60% w/r