Players should be allow to Leave a game after a certain amount of time. Really

GhostOfTsushima··1 votes·817 views

So most average game now are about 25min - 35min

When anyone spend 45min+ in a game, that duration is just too long and some players get stress and tilted or even tired of playing that game especially when they're losing already but the enemy team is just so bad they don't know how to end, and your team is worst because they allow a bad a team to stomp them.

I don't like surrendering but if I'm the only one trying to win while my team is jerking each other. Why would I want to keep playing. I'm just a hostage force to keep clicking my mouse until the game end.

I don't care if it possible to win super late game, when it reaches that long amount of time, my team definitely don't deserve the LP. Especially the one that don't even try or the one that shouldn't even be in my game in the first place because Riot's match making is unbalance.

Because players cannot quit or leave the game, they choose to afk in the jungle or just int so the enemy can end quickly.

Seriously tho what's the point of winning a 60min game if you only get 20LP lmao, especially if your MMR is shit, you'll earn less than 20LP

Just go next, you'll prolly have a better chance at winning your next 2 game before that game is over anyway.

15 Comments

KennysDreamGirl3 votes

if you dont wanna deal with long games then dont click ready up

GhostOfTsushima1 votes

{quoted}

if you dont wanna deal with long games then dont click ready up

or maybe if you can't play the game, don't click play

that works too you know

Doge20201 votes

{quoted}

or maybe if you can't play the game, don't click play

that works too you know

Or just play ARAM or bot games

KennysDreamGirl2 votes

{quoted}

or maybe if you can't play the game, don't click play

that works too you know

cant play the game? youre the one saying it should be fine to just quit because the game went long.

GhostOfTsushima1 votes

{quoted}

cant play the game? youre the one saying it should be fine to just quit because the game went long.

you seen mad about this thread, you must be one of them kid that feed in their game and kept his team hostage

do you even have a job? Cus I wouldn't be surprise at how much time you got on your hands

but maybe not, i dont think you're even good enough to hold out a game long enough lol

La Belle Sauvage1 votes

Your ad hominem response aka the insults you hurl or assumptions you make about Bean, does not move your original premise forward. Attacking the person is a fallacy Kam, and you can not win an argument that way.

And at Best you response makes you seem childish.

GhostOfTsushima1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Bello Bagheera,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=yPA4f0yj,comment-id=00000000000100000000,timestamp=2018-05-09T18:30:40.873+0000)

Your ad hominem response aka the insults you hurl or assumptions you make about Bean, does not move your original premise forward. Attacking the person is a fallacy Kam, and can not win you an argument.

And at Best you response makes you seem childish.

I'm sorry kids like you are easily offended by a single thread LOL

But umm feel free to let out you're salt and anger, that's what the board is for.

La Belle Sauvage1 votes

Except I'm neither a kid, offended, or angry. I'm pointing out your agumentation is weak.

It's clear that you are not interested in a discussion as much as you are in trying to insult any who disagree.

GhostOfTsushima1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Bello Bagheera,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=yPA4f0yj,comment-id=0000000000010000000000000000,timestamp=2018-05-09T18:42:27.577+0000)

Except I'm neither a kid, offended, or angry. I'm pointing out your agumentation is weak.

It's clear that you are not interested in a discussion as much as you are in trying to insult any who disagree.

As the kid before you who came in and instead of making a positive he wanted to stop an argument

and then you the other kid, you may not think you're one but you act like one so it makes you one

La Belle Sauvage1 votes

Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my case.

La Belle Sauvage1 votes

I agree with Bean. You are aware that sometimes games go past 30 minutes if you're not okay with that then don't play.

HalcyonDweller3 votes

I can see where you are coming from about this, but I don't think you've gone after the issue in the right way. This is just going to elicit negative responses.

IMO there should be a scaling surrender vote, so at 10/15 minutes it takes unanimous surrender, at 20 minutes a majority of 4, and at 30 minutes a majority of 3. This would hinder the ability for duos to troll their team and hold them hostage.

Pika Fox2 votes

Option to quit at the 1hr 40 min mark would be good imo for the few games people abuse to trap people in the 6hr+ long games. Other than those edge case clear abuse situations (in which the abusers should really be permad), you signed up for the game. 1hr is entirely reasonable.

HeeroTX2 votes

I'd say make this an option for Ranked: After 10 mins, anyone can leave at any time. Period. But if you leave without normal surrender vote then you lose 1.5x LP, the remaining players get bonus LP if they win based on how long you're playing with the disadvantage. (say, a minimum of 5 mins to prevent "leave right before victory" abuse case) Make no mistake, I'm all for playing to win and trying until the Nexus explodes, but I also know there's a bunch of times when you get people that will either actively grief or be negative enough that their contribution is minimal at best to where I don't think you lose much if they're gone.

But ultimately, this is why solo-q NEEDS some kind of individual scoring to it, because you really can't "force" teamwork.

BrokenRayquaza1 votes

I like this idea, kinda 60 mins is too short and would be stupid 120 mins is a good time for this to be acceptable as, this usually means a game is being held hostage. But only for incredibly long games like the ones the Oceania challengers make.

More from Gameplay

More by GhostOfTsushima