Who is stronger in a 1v1, Warwick or Trundle?
My friend says Trundle because his ult is very nasty, but doesn't Warwick's ult reduce incoming damage by 55% even if Trundle ults. Not to mention, it has a hard CC that would disrupt Trundle from further damaging, and then Warwick could also suppress Trundle to further CC him while Trundle is at his strongest. Of course, none this would work out if Trundle has QSS, but since that is normally not a standard build, wouldn't Warwick win as long as he manages to have enough health from surviving Trundle's ult since his potential steroids exceed Trundle's? I mean, Warwick can get 110% max attack speed vs Trundle who gets 80%, and Warwick has far more sustain when he lower in health plus his Q, and has two forms of damage AP and AD, while Trundle is mostly AD, so Warwick could itemize more efficiently though Spirit Visage is really good on both. Not to mention, Trundle has no real hard CC outside of his knock up from his wall, while Warwick's flee actually benefits him in duels. What y'all think?
for both of them
Warwick wins. His base damage is a LOT higher than trundles.
TIME TO TROLL