Tell me if you disagree that these champions have had more negative uproar than others
Darius Zed Thresh Yasuo Kalista
In general these champions have not only raised incredible amount of community outcry, but have also topped ban/pick list. No one wants to play against them.
The Red Warden6 votesThe main problem with his champs is that they all have so many mechanics while existing in the same game as champions like Olaf who barely come close to their levels of complexity. If all the champions in LoL were like CT's then they would barely be noticeable but all champions arn't so we get left with them needing countless nerfs or buffs for everyone else.
Direwolfiez3 votesI don't get why CertainlyT doesn't just quit Riot and go work for Valve on Dota 2, he'd fit in so much better there.
ULTRAF0RCE2 votesI don't personally believe they are toxic champions, I think that they are champions with interesting ideas, that may have too many cool ideas at the same time.
Thresh is a good support none of his ability are targeted so he feels like a champion that you need to be skilled at to play, zed has some really cool mechanics with his shadows, and it feels incredible when you beat a zed because of his massive out play potential
Talamare3 votesI don't personally believe they are toxic champions, I think that they are champions with interesting ideas, that may have too many cool ideas at the same time.
Thresh is a good support none of his ability are targeted so he feels like a champion that you need to be skilled at to play, zed has some really cool mechanics with his shadows, and it feels incredible when you beat a zed because of his massive out play potential
It feels incredible to beat a Zed because you basically beat a champion that is likely significantly better than yours
http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/stats/by-banrate Zed and Yasuo dominating the ban rate
http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/comps Thresh / Kalista dominating the comp rate, Thresh and Kalista in general dominating the pick rate too http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/stats
ULTRAF0RCE1 votesJust a reminder according to that same list of gold plus, Yasuo has the third lowest win rate, Kalista has the lowest win rate, Darius and zed have 73 and 75 as how good their win rate and thresh has 92, this seems to prove to me that they are not quite as overbearing as you believe http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/stats/by-winrate
Talamare1 votesJust a reminder according to that same list of gold plus, Yasuo has the third lowest win rate, Kalista has the lowest win rate, Darius and zed have 73 and 75 as how good their win rate and thresh has 92, this seems to prove to me that they are not quite as overbearing as you believe http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/stats/by-winrate
That actually points to them being even more poorly designed Not only are they insanely overbearing with insanely overloaded kits, that feels absolutely terrible playing against them but they don't even do very well...
Talamare2 votesIn general these champions have not only raised incredible amount of community outcry, but have also topped ban/pick list until they were gutted to be ineffective
xl Kirito lx2 votesI love seeing these champions, and playing against them. They all have clearly defined weaknesses that allow for the potential to outplay. They also require a good amount of skill to play, which just adds to your opportunity to outplay them.
Angry Monster1 votesi love how people throw around the word toxic. It no longer has the meaning it was supposed to.
DarthSpectrum1 votesI raise you: Fizz, Kassadin, Le Blanc, Akali, and Talon.
At least CertainlyT's champions can be outplayed to a degree, as well as only being effective once one is familiar with them. I rather have these type of champion archetypes than the ones I listed above, who literally win fights by having better ratios and stats or spam-mable invulnerability mechanics.