Why isn't squishiness/immobility considered counterplay?
I'm sorry, but I'm not buying the Veigar stun delay in the name of 'unfair' and 'counterplay'.
Ya, maybe he can 100 to 0 someone under the right conditions, but he has absolutely 0 mobility and extreme squishiness to make up for it. Why isn't Leblanc or Zed punished for their 100-to-0-ness when they both have extreme mobility in addition to their damage, and don't rely on efficient farming to gain their burst either.
Anytime I get bursted by Veigar I feel like i deserved it because the counterplay opportunities are there. I could always have baited his stun/double-teamed him/built mr/shut down his farm to counter him. Meanwhile LB and Zed have the same strengths with less weaknesses but they don't have to pay for their power. (although to be fair LB was nerfed and only recently rediscovered)
Not only that, but Veigar's core item is removed and he is...nerfed to make up for it? Because he's the problem child? It must be because of his overwhelming presence in LCS/pro level, right? Oh, that's also Leblance and Zed?
GG Rito
PS - This isn't supposed to be a Zed/Leblanc rage thread as personally I don't have too much of a problem with them theoretically. I just want to point out the extreme inconsistencies in the logic of Riot's indiscriminate nerf bat. I'm also not liking the EVERYTHING IS SKILLSHOTZ direction things seem to be taking because things like squishiness and lack of mobility don't seem to be enough 'counterplay' for riot.


What's next, no counter to Kat? hard CC > kat.