What would you rather have, a feeder or an afk?

Absolute0Chaos··2 votes·606 views

And the feeder isn't trying to feed, but only has the misfortune of being matched with opponent(s) that are simply better.

9 Comments

The3cho4 votes

Definitely the feeder. I've had the good fortune of being able to carry my 0/5 top laner as AD carry on multiple occasions. They give me openings and I'll give them the comeback they long for.

Frostwoman3 votes

feeder almost 100% of time.

their feeding of gold to enemy team does not outweigh the benefits of having another champion on ur team.

NoMonku1 votes

I'd rather have an AFK. A feeder is giving additional gold to the enemy team and while the AFKER is negatively impacting the game, it is only through their lack of presence, not by giving the enemy team additional gold/xp to more easily beat us.

Alljoy1 votes

I'd rather clone myself four more times and play with I, Me, Myself, and Yours Truly.

TheXtractor1 votes

define 'feeder'.

if its an intentional feeder who goes 0/40/0 walking mid as soon as he spawns, then probably the afk.

If its just a legit person who is doing their best but not having their game, then keep them because they can still be useful later in the game.

Absolute0Chaos1 votes

I've already said it's the latter.

Reaper Soraka1 votes

D'aww so many people say feeder over afk. maybe I'll try non-support things more often. <3

Kyoukocola1 votes

This is a hard choice....

Matezoide1 votes

Obviously the feeder.

It eventually gets to a point he will not be worth gold at all. And if he is playing a CC heavy champion and legit trying his best to win, he will be useful in team fights, especially if he builds tankier than usual. At worst he can serve as a meat shield for a few seconds.

More from Gameplay

More by Absolute0Chaos