shouldn't ekko's shield last at least the same time as his stun?

rawiazam1·9/16/2019, 4:20:07 PM·3 votes·1,357 views

i see no reason as to why his shield last 1.75 secs and his stun lasts longer

5 Comments

Apostle of Light9/16/2019, 4:35:04 PM4 votes

While I don't think Ekko needs yet another buff, I do agree that the discrepancy is strange

Saezio9/16/2019, 10:55:26 PM3 votes

The shield is easier to obtain than the Stun.

The stun needs amazing setup to hit, and thus is rewarded more.

You can W on yourself to 100% get the shield. you can W on your enemy, then hope they do NOTHING for 3 seconds while you are charging at them to hit the stun once in a blue moon. xD

nyakasgoods9/16/2019, 4:56:09 PM2 votes

Shouldn't Ekko's stun not last longer than his shield?

Kazekiba9/16/2019, 4:41:41 PM1 votes

The shield is to protect you from enemies outside of the bubble, or if they evaded the bubble because of its very long warning period. Not to mention if your Ult travels through the bubble, you still get the shield. There's a number of situations in which you'll be in the bubble but miss the stun.

Essentially, makes Parallel Convergence more reliable as a defensive tool without making Ekko invulnerable for 5 seconds

Darkdemon6539/16/2019, 11:12:36 PM1 votes

The duration of the shield should increase if he stuns someone. The same is true to Neeko's ult.