Why can't Warwick be disabled *after* he ults?

what you deserve··2 votes·2,711 views

Mute sound before watching https://youtu.be/dRDPzhklTC8

Warwick doesn't get knocked up by my ult here, after he lands on me with his and is standing on top of me. If you see it, it actually says "can't be disabled" I thought he was only supposed to be immune to disables while leaping..? What's this shit?

He would have actually died if I'd been able to knock him back under turret there. He ends up killing me and walking away with 20 hp.

8 Comments

Dreadlocks1 votes

bug

what you deserve1 votes

so better question is why doesn't riot even have a QA team

Big Lincoln1 votes

looks like a bug, i haven't had that issu

Lancerblader1 votes

actually looking closer at the clip it seems that as soon as ww's ult ended and just as u ulted, he used his q, and if i remember in that split second when he latches onto ya he cannot be displaced, so no knockups or knockbacks

what you deserve1 votes

pretty sure you're supposed to be able to displace him while he's using his q

Lancerblader1 votes

{quoted}

pretty sure you're supposed to be able to displace him while he's using his q

i think the q could be the reason in this case, i know for when u hold down q to move behind your target u definately cant be displaced as i do remember seeing a vid on utube pointing this out, demonstrating it on the drake by ignoring it's initial knockback when it enters combat.

not as sure for just pressing q instead but when i looked closely at your clip i could see that ww definately used his q at the same time as u wouldve knocked him up

Waffletimewarp1 votes

{quoted}

pretty sure you're supposed to be able to displace him while he's using his q

Nope. He can't be disabled while jumping behind you either

mosaickle1 votes

That's a bug for sure..

Also RIP Lulu :'(

More from Gameplay

More by what you deserve