another league of legends game where top lane 1v5'd

zarxus1234·Jun 28, 2017·3 votes·522 views

Because this games balance is fucking amazing.

Oh wait its absolute trash.

12 Comments

Jo0oJun 28, 20174 votes

The offending Yorick went a respectable 8/5/2, with a ton of CS and likely many objectives. Sure.

Your own Fizz went 15/7/6 in the loss.

You had the lowest damage on your team by a fair margin, and second lowest across both teams behind only the enemy full-tank Zac.

Uh.

zarxus1234Jun 28, 20171 votes

{quoted}

The offending Yorick went a respectable 8/5/2, with a ton of CS and likely many objectives. Sure.

Your own Fizz went 15/7/6 in the loss.

You had the lowest damage on your team by a fair margin, and second lowest across both teams behind only the enemy full-tank Zac.

Uh.

yeah yorick was the only one who did better than his opponent. And the game was a steamroll because he was able to 1v3 at the 20 minute mark. Is that a justification for them to win the game?

When 4 other people did better than their opponents?

Why isn't the fed fizz able to 1v5? Because the games balance is poor.

Jo0oJun 28, 20172 votes

Man, take some responsibility for your own losses. You did no damage, as an assassin. That loss is on YOU. Not your Olaf with one fewer kill, one more death, five more assists, and 25 less CS than the apparently overpowered Yorick. You.

zarxus1234Jun 28, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Man, take some responsibility for your own losses. You did no damage, as an assassin. That loss is on YOU. Not your Olaf with one fewer kill, one more death, five more assists, and 25 less CS than the apparently overpowered Yorick. You.

me we fuckign won every 4v4 by a landlslide. i took out cait every fight. Every skirmish cait wasnt the issue. zed nothing. But it didnt matter if we didnt send 3 back for yorick he would 1v2. That game was 100% top lane.

Jo0oJun 28, 20171 votes

So, you lost to a successful split-push effort. That's a strategy that works sometimes, but it's certainly not impossible to shut down. You weren't "1v5"d like you claimed in the title; you simply had a player develop a lead in lane and then out-macro you.

Hopefully you'll learn from the loss, rather than continuing to complain about perceived balance issues on the boards.

zarxus1234Jun 28, 20171 votes

{quoted}

So, you lost to a successful split-push effort. That's a strategy that works sometimes, but it's certainly not impossible to shut down. You weren't "1v5"d like you claimed in the title; you simply had a player develop a lead in lane and then out-macro you.

Hopefully you'll learn from the loss, rather than continuing to complain about perceived balance issues on the boards.

the dude won the game 1v5 because of the way he played. if our top lane would have won it would have been a surrender at 15. The fact like champions like that... who 1v3 just because auto win games.

Jo0oJun 28, 20171 votes

Okay, so what's your point? The enemy toplaner carried?

Sometimes toplaners carry.

FowusJun 28, 20172 votes

colossus shaco lmao

RanmaruJun 28, 20171 votes

{quoted}

The offending Yorick went a respectable 8/5/2, with a ton of CS and likely many objectives. Sure.

Your own Fizz went 15/7/6 in the loss.

You had the lowest damage on your team by a fair margin, and second lowest across both teams behind only the enemy full-tank Zac.

Uh. This guy acts like he owns the boards XD

zarxus1234Jun 28, 20172 votes