What if Thornmail inflicted grievous wounds?

Disulfiram··4 votes·922 views

AFAIK Thornmail as an item exists mainly as a counter to ADCs lifestealing; so why not make it inflict GW on the attacker instead of reflecting damage? Let's be honest here, Rammus is the only one who actually uses the damage reflection, and that's only because he builds tons of armor anyway and because he has his own damage reflection skill.

23 Comments

nananananacat4 votes

ADCs would honestly be in such a bad spot if it applied Grievous Wounds.

FireDrizzle3 votes

{quoted}

ADCs would honestly be in such a bad spot if it applied Grievous Wounds.

Disagree.

It would counter sustain based champs. I would hate to be Swain and lose half my healing because I autoed a tank with thornmail. Or Vlad but I hate him too much to ever play him.

Disulfiram1 votes

Eh, you're right, autoattacking is such a fundamental part of Swain's teamfighting that this change would certainly destroy him. /sarcasm

FireDrizzle1 votes

{quoted}

Eh, you're right, autoattacking is such a fundamental part of Swain's teamfighting that this change would certainly destroy him. /sarcasm

Swain is isnt the only champ that relies on sustain.

Disulfiram1 votes

He's the one you mentioned in your stupid argument. With Vlad, another notorious autoattacker.

Handy Sandy 3 votes

How do you counter this new thornmail then?

Warlord Scrap2 votes

If the grievous wounds is only applied to autos focus with abilities

Handy Sandy 3 votes

{quoted}

If the grievous wounds is only applied to autos focus with abilities

So one item makes autoattack based champions almost completely useless? It's gonna be built on everyone then Ahri Akali Ekko Brand just like ninja tabis

Disulfiram1 votes

You can't be serious. GW halves healing. It does not nullify autoattack damage.

Handy Sandy 1 votes

{quoted}

You can't be serious. GW halves healing. It does not nullify autoattack damage.

That still makes autoattack based champions pretty useless. Nautilus Maokai Tanks can already be unkillable, don't need more of that by removing the only hard counter to them.

Colte2 votes

i wouldn't mind them keeping reflect and add grievious wounds as a bonus, nobody builds that item anyways

Okuma4 votes

{quoted}

i wouldn't mind them keeping reflect and add grievious wounds as a bonus, nobody builds that item anyways

It would become broken tbh.

Big Lincoln2 votes

yeah, let's make another item just like item 3123 where you get to shit on anyone with sustain for doing absolutely nothing. That's great gameplay, dude

Disulfiram1 votes

Don't autoattack the one who bought it. Simple. Swain, Fiddle, etc don't need to auto at all. Mundo, Irelia, Xin, etc will jump on the backline and ignore the tank anyway. Seriously, the only class that would be affected by this are ADCs, which is exactly what Thornmail was supposed to do in the first place.

Big Lincoln2 votes

Yes, and let me just not play the game as Illaoi, Darius, Garen, Nasus, Trundle because fighting anyone with Thornmail will out-draintank me unless I build it too.

"don't attack this person ever" is a shit idea.

Disulfiram1 votes

Garen and Trundle. Right. They famously rely on in-fight sustain to duel, and not on after-the-battle passives. Good argument.

And yes, if you want to counter draintanking 1v1 as a draintank, you're supposed to be building that item too. Or are you maybe part of the sad group that would build Rammus full armor vs 5 APs?

FireDrizzle1 votes

{quoted}

Don't autoattack the one who bought it. Simple.

ok Galio Rammus Shen

Disulfiram1 votes

So the enemy diver went out of his way to taunt Swain. Gee, if only we had other priority targets that could profit from that wasted CC. Oh wait, we do! But it doesn't matter that we do, since that CC can be cast every second anyway. Oh wait...

doodlebob6662 votes

here's a list of champions with sustain and need to auto attack not counting adc's Fiora Illaoi Trundle Aatrox Olaf Volibear DrMundo Hecarim Maokai Gragas Nocturne XinZhao DariusNasus Renekton Yorick Warwick what the fuck are they supposed to do against this?

Disulfiram1 votes

Dive the backline? You know, the very thing they are usually trying to do? Crazy thought, I know. It's a much better idea to focus that one tank who bought the very item designed to counter them.

doodlebob6661 votes

alot of these champs are split pushers who are completely useless in a team fight against a tank in general since they'll just get cc'ed, losing there main way of winning trades just for trading is not healthy game design

Disulfiram1 votes

GW kills them that badly? Then they're lucky that there isn't already in the game a cheap GW item that would achieve the same result with even less effort. item 3123

Yaśuo Main1 votes

Nasus, go dive the backline while ignoring our backline.

Aatrox, your useless. It's either you get popped while trying to go in the backline or you can't heal correctly in the entire fight.

Maokai, go dive the backline.

Mundo, go dive the backline.

Volibear, GTFO.

Fiora, have fun going to the backline.

Gragas, have fun going to the backline.

Yorick, go dive the backline even though you don't have the tools to actually do that.

Thornmail wasn't meant to counter lifesteal, it was meant to be countered by lifesteal itself. So I seriously don't see the point of this post.

More from Gameplay

More by Disulfiram