Seriously the only reason why adcs dominate is because

Keyoshi·Nov 25, 2015·2 votes·444 views

armor items cost too damn much, Seriously what the fuck, If an ap gets fed or an ad gets fed as a tanky player i need to adjust and get mr or armor to whatever is fed, If an ap gets fed i can get BV or SV after i get my laning item. After that im completely starved on gold because the adc already has 4 items compared to my 3. Decrease the price of armor or increase the price of ad cause this is some serious craziness. If an ad gets fed i get some armor but i still need to get mr by the 4th item or else the ap will have the gold to actually start doing damage, Depending how far behind he is. Riot fix this, please i beg you as a tanky player decrease the amount of gold armor costs.

7 Comments

KeyoshiNov 25, 20152 votes

Jk i lied the only reason why adc's dominate is beccause you overbuffed them with broken items and nerfed ap so they cant do what they were created to do.

junglerboy16Nov 25, 20151 votes

Until you realize that you can stack armor to no end because mages are screwed by itemization and masteries even worse than the tanks and since ADCs don't build LW and co. you can get away with a 500 armor Malphite and be tanky as hell with no repercussions.

Armor items are strong right now, and it shows in who has the top winrates; several of them are tanks. In fact, of the top 20 win rate champs (all of whom are at or above a 52.7% win rate average), 7 are tanks (9 if you consider Swain and Skarner are tanks, but that's debatable).

IncognonymousNov 25, 20151 votes

{quoted}

Until you realize that you can stack armor to no end because mages are screwed by itemization and masteries even worse than the tanks and since ADCs don't build LW and co. you can get away with a 500 armor Malphite and be tanky as hell with no repercussions.

Armor items are strong right now, and it shows in who has the top winrates; several of them are tanks. In fact, of the top 20 win rate champs (all of whom are at or above a 52.7% win rate average), 7 are tanks (9 if you consider Swain and Skarner are tanks, but that's debatable).

Tanks traditionally have the highest winrates for the most consistent periods of time.

Surprise, surprise-- classes that offer a lot to a team win a lot of games.

no repercussions 500 armor

You just spent gold on 500 armor, no health, and no MR. Prepare your anus. Health is the premier defensive stat. Has been since season 3. Now that botrk has been nerfed, literally no raisin not to build it.

junglerboy16Nov 25, 20151 votes

For Malphite (who has a free 30% armor steroid) he actually only invests gold into about 230-250 armor to reach that amount, and some of that comes from runes and masteries. He only needs deadman's plate, sunfire cape, Thornmail, and ninja tabi to reach that, and that isn't even stacking just armor, since he still has room for two more items of his choice.

Oh, yeah, he also has a free shield and his two core armor items give him over 1000 bonus HP on their own. Just give him an Abyssal Scepter or Iceborn gauntlet and the new and improved Spirit visage and he is set to tear you a new one. Seriously, don't be so naive to assume I'm stacking raw armor and nothing else, that would be idiotic, and obviously would have repercussions.

As for tanks being consistently good because they are team players, you obviously haven't looks at the stats for Rammus or Mundo, both of whom spiked in win rate by several percent when 5.22 came out. They may have been above average win rate before the patch, but they are both significantly stronger after the patch.

Maybe you should read up on the stats before you spout off crap like this.

IncognonymousNov 25, 20151 votes

[deleted]

junglerboy16Nov 25, 20151 votes

Hehe, I love how calling you out made your post devolve into a pile of gibberish and ad hominem slurs.

Also, Deadman's plate is good on literally everyone, what hole have you been living in that you would miss that?

And please, can you stop spreading the lies that games last only 25 minutes? The majority of my games easily last 30-35 right now (granted, before they lasted 35-45, so it is shorter, just not to the same hyperbolic levels everyone claims). The majority of the streams I watch have games in the 35 minute range, with the occasional outlier lasting only 25 or an exceptionally long 45 minute match, so it isn't just something about me and the way I play the game either.

My claims don't look that ridiculous when they're supported by facts and numbers, meanwhile I see yours are supported by...