Rageblade should be 3600-3800 gold.

warpenguin555·Mar 3, 2016·4 votes·732 views

Make it one of those top gold items. AP champions have Marksmen have and Why cant Hybrid champions have as their version of the 3 above price wise?

When Rageblade is fully stacked its 192.2% gold efficient (was going to go into more detail but i got confused by all the numbers XD. Gonna stick to what the link gave me) Whoa. thats alot. The stats given out when it is fully stacked is worth 4544 gold, and this thing is almost always going to be at full stacks. This... this is a problem. It could cost up to 4544 gold and still be gold efficient, yet it costs almost half of that.

4 Comments

Irelia BotMar 3, 20161 votes

so basically make an item that is less then cost efficent when not stacked cost 3800?

It is really just a case of better then everythign else which is crap currently since Trinity and BotRK both got nerfed in the eyes of fighters. The main reason why Yi is so insane right now is Sated Devourer.

Sated Devourer is the thing that needs to be nerfed considering that only one top laner who buys rageblade is over a 50% win rate.

warpenguin555Mar 3, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Irelia Bot,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=lYEAL0Ts,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-03-03T15:49:17.443+0000)

so basically make an item that is less then cost efficent when not stacked cost 3800?

It is really barly viable as is and the main reason why Yi is so insain right now is Sated Devourer.

Sated Devourer is the thing that needs to be nerfed considering that only one top laner who buys rageblade is actaully over a 50% win rate.

Sated needs a rework. As even stated by Riot, it plows through low elo and is widely ignored in high elo.

Meep ManMar 3, 20161 votes

No, Guinsoo's is very stat efficient because it basically ONLY gives stats. It's impossible to measure the cost efficiency of say item 3072 and so therefore it seems not as extreme when, in reality, it's passive's gold efficiency might be just as high.

Mandang0Mar 3, 20161 votes

Did you seriously just argue that bloodthirster has more non-stat value than rageblade? ...or am I just reading this wrong, because that seems completely backwards?

EDIT: Perhaps what I should be asking is whether you think the value of BT's passive is harder to evaluate than rageblade's. Well, go figure out the max strength of the overshield and equate it to an amount of health then figure out how much that health would cost. Boom, easy. The math the wiki does for the value of an on-hit is less reliable because 1) most on-hits don't cleave, 2) there are only a very few magic damage on-hits in the game from which to derive the base value of magic on-hit damage, and 3) the on-hit for rageblade scales with your AP and AD.