Dragon: is it worth?

SummonerSquid··1 votes·3,134 views

After tinkering with the new SR a bit, my biggest question is... is it worth it to slay the dragon?

Note: I use the words "your" and "your team" interchangeably when talking about the dragon buffs. Remember that the buffs are global, so they apply to your whole team even if I use the word "your". I'll specific if something applies to just one player on the team.

  1. My first thought was yes, because you can get significant buffs. On the other hand, slaying the dragon no longer puts you ahead, but rather gives you kill potential. The old dragon put your team in the gold lead and helped you progress to victory directly. The new dragon doesn't do that. It's a larger investment to kill for a smaller initial reward, but a greater reward for successive dragon kills.

Getting to the point: The old dragon gave you gold, the new dragon gives you the potential to get gold

  1. One of the reasons gold is almost synonymous with "who's winning" is that more gold allows you to buy better items, which give you better stats. Gold = Items = Stats. Maximizing gold allows you to maximize your stats, as long as you go back to the shop to cash out. The old dragon was a means of gold, which eventually became AP, AD, MS, LS, Etc.

The new dragon cuts out the middleman and gives you stats directly. One benefit of the new dragon is that you become stronger directly after slaying it, and there is no need to go back to base and buy items first. If you can sustain through the dragon while slaying it, you have more stats to fight with or take further objectives.

Getting to the point: If you can sustain through the dragon, you now have more immediate snowballing power

  1. The stats you get from slaying the dragon scale, no pun intended. This means that a single dragon gives you a ton of extra late game power. In comparison to the old dragon, the first buff gives you more stats than you could get before, but you are unable to chose which stats it gives you. The old dragon gave 180-270 gold, which is theoretically worth 5-7.5 AD and 8.3-12.4 AP. Let's say you have 80 AP, which is probably around your first or second back. The new dragon gives you 6.4 AP, which is less than the gold value of the AP the old dragon would have given you. Same goes for AD and for both stats combined. If you have 200 AP you get an additional 16 from dragon, which is a lot more than you would have gotten before. Same goes for AD and for both stats combined.

Getting to the point: The new first dragon buff outscales the old one at around 170 AP and 100 AD

  1. The buffs get pretty significant as you slay more and more dragons. The buffs also seem to benefit certain phases of the game. For example, it makes sense that the first buff gives you scaling stat bonuses, because in the early game you're still trying to build up your champion's stats. The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th buffs focus on waveclear, rotations, and objective control, which are much more important in the later stages of the game. The 5th, 6th, and nth bonuses you get are more or less "end the game" buffs because of the huge power spikes you get.

Getting to the point: The new dragon buffs address concerns to different phases of the game

These are just some of the big differences. Early dragons won't pay off until you're team is able to level up and buy enough items to get some damage. For certain tanks and support champions, the %AP/%AD increase won't benefit you directly, but will benefit your damage dealers. This impacts solo queue, because tank and support-based junglers now receive fewer benefits from the dragon, or at least from the first buff.

With all that being said, is the new dragon worth?

I understand this is a lot of text. Skim through the bolded parts at your leisure. Let me know if you agree, disagree, or are confused.

4 Comments

Cozarkian1 votes

Let's say you have Orianna mid (lowest AD in the game) and decide to take middle inhib with your jungler while the enemy takes dragon. You get 100 + 150/2 = 175 gold. That's worth 100 - 110 AP (depending upon NDL, Blasting Wand or Amplifying Tome). But you also got 3 free AD at level 1, which scales to 4 AD at level 7. Okay, maybe dragon wasn't the best for YOU. But what about your team?

That new Kalista in your bottom lane got 100 gold from your tower, which is worth almost 3 AD. If she started with a Doran's blade, dragon would have given her 5 AD at level 1 and 6 AD at level 7 (assuming no AD masteries or AD runes). So Kalista is better off with the dragon buff.

Now let's pretend it was Kalista + support that took bottom tower instead of dragon. With 150 gold, Kalista can buy 5 AD (after she saves up for a pickaxe) but dragon buff would give her 5 AD instantly at level 1 with just a doran's blade. Kalista is almost certainly better off with dragon. Meanwhile, Orianna in mid now only got 100 gold, which is only worth 5 AP. She only needs to get to 60 AP to be better off with dragon. She'll have that with her first blasting wand + 0 offensive masteries.

Overall, dragon > 1 tower in all situations. It's an instant buff, a stronger buff for AD champions, a stronger buff for AP champs by the time they finish their first item, and it gives AP champs and tanks a little extra oomph to their auto attacks.

SummonerSquid1 votes

Overall, dragon > 1 tower in all situations. It's an instant buff, a stronger buff for AD champions, a stronger buff for AP champs by the time they finish their first item, and it gives AP champs and tanks a little extra oomph to their auto attacks.

It's hard to say, but I think I agree with you. Let's say the opposing team gets the first dragon and you get a tower. In 6 minutes, you each get some items that give you around 80 more AP or 50 more AD (this is probably less than what you'd get, but simple for the point). The next dragon fight will be easier for both teams, because one has more map control and one has more kill potential.

You have to pick between having the map control advantage or having the kill potential advantage, and who's to say which one is more helpful in getting the next dragon? There's no clear answer.

Fırewall1 votes

I look at dragon like a comeback tool now. If I'm winning, I ponder about taking it to push my advantage forward, while still knowing that it highly depends on my team comp.

If I'm losing, I ultimately decide that I can't allow the enemy team to take dragons, or their stat advantage is going to get even higher, and in turn, if we get it, it narrows the stat gap between us and the enemy.

Worth if losing/Late game team, not worth if winning/early game team

SummonerSquid1 votes

I look at dragon like a comeback tool now. If I'm winning, I ponder about taking it to push my advantage forward, while still knowing that it highly depends on my team comp.

If I'm losing, I ultimately decide that I can't allow the enemy team to take dragons, or their stat advantage is going to get even higher, and in turn, if we get it, it narrows the stat gap between us and the enemy.

Worth if losing/Late game team, not worth if winning/early game team

I kinda agree with you here, but that's the problem. You pick an early game team to get early objective control, but don't utilize the benefits in the early game. You pick a late game team to win in the late game, but your enemy is scaling harder than you because they got dragons.

I understand this is what Riot was going for. It just seems too balanced. There's no clear way to get the lead with dragons anymore.

More from Gameplay

More by SummonerSquid