The live balance team might actually be doing a great job

Linna Excel··2 votes·845 views

If LOG is correct in their numbers, somehow the live balance team managed to pull of an interesting trick. There are at the moment 144 champs in the game. Totally gross, right? Anyways you'd expect the 50% win rate champ to be somewhere around the 72nd spot on the win rate sort list. The 4 champs who are at 50% win rate are in the 85th to 88th slot. This is more than 10% later than you'd expect to see them appear. While LOG might be wrong, the number of popular champs below a 50% win rate makes them at least plausible, with yuumi, akali, and yasuo being the biggest offenders.

Another interesting fact is that right now only about 25 champs are below a 49% win rate. 11 of those are at 48% which still isn't terrible. Considering they have to deal with 144 champs, the fact that 5/6ths of the roster, including the off meta picks, are at least competitive is a good sign of the balance of the game.

So yeah, I think the live balance team is doing its job pretty well. If you were to randomly decide on a champ to main, the fact you are more likely to find one with a winning percentage than not is in your favor. More champs are climbing right now than not. This means we finally have proof of one thing we've all long suspected: the match making system really is out to get you in your promos. Also, the number of popular champs with a low win rate really makes me question some of the player base.

Looking at you Ez mains. This is what happens when you force riot to nerf all the things you break in game.

10 Comments

DongerStuck4 votes

its artificially boosted by riot matchmaking one sided bulshit. Its not that the game is ballanced, its that the matchmaking is rigged to make you win 50% of your games annd lose the other 50%.... BASICALLY, you arent having an impact on your games, or barely.

Jamaree3 votes

{quoted}

its artificially boosted by riot matchmaking one sided bulshit. Its not that the game is ballanced, its that the matchmaking is rigged to make you win 50% of your games annd lose the other 50%.... BASICALLY, you arent having an impact on your games, or barely.

You realize that if matchmaking was “good”, his would happen anyway right?

DongerStuck5 votes

making the matchmaking to force the 50% is not a good thing.... champions should get 50% winrates without making the game a coin flip

Jamaree4 votes

{quoted}

making the matchmaking to force the 50% is not a good thing.... champions should get 50% winrates without making the game a coin flip

But having a 50% win rate is a good matchmaking system, I don’t understand why people think hat a different matchmaking system would magically make people stop trolling, having bad games, afks, etc.

If matchmaking was “good” like you think you want it, you would eventually have a 50% win rate anyway because you would hit your own personal cap in skill and not go any higher until then, this forcing you into that 50%.

DongerStuck2 votes

it used to be the way im asking it to be... it changed recently and most people agree that its now a coin flip... i dont know what to tell you.... i know im not going to change your mind so lets agree to disagree.

12341231241234123 votes

Honestly id prefer to have an impact on my games than everyone having 50% winrates because the matchmaking is forcing it...

Jamaree2 votes

[{quoted}](name=xXViRuS Qc 123Xx,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=k10vNbgk,comment-id=000000000001,timestamp=2019-05-28T22:18:15.249+0000)

Honestly id prefer to have an impact on my games than everyone having 50% winrates because the matchmaking is forcing it...

In what regard?

DongerStuck2 votes

WHat you mean? its simple man, if they push the 50% winrate in the matchmaking, it means no matter what you do, you lose or win, you have no impact, how is that hard to understand?

Jamaree3 votes

{quoted}

WHat you mean? its simple man, if they push the 50% winrate in the matchmaking, it means no matter what you do, you lose or win, you have no impact, how is that hard to understand?

Why I don’t understand is what people are asking for as an alternative. I don’t understand what people think would happen if they changed the current system.

Let’s say they removed this forced matchmaking, what would we get instead and what do people think would happen?

Would it just be a system of throw people randomly together with the same MMR, because then you get players who are just unlucky and never win and the flip side as well.

My point is people don’t want good matchmaking, they want bad matchmaking slanted in their favor.

Edge of Daybreak1 votes

My point is people don’t want good matchmaking, they want bad matchmaking slanted in their favor.

This shit right here. This is why nothing is changing because anyone that would have any pull in changing matchmaking can see the actual thing people want and not whatever bullshit is being spammed on boards.

More from Gameplay

More by Linna Excel