One for All Majority Vote is Dumb

Endrai·8/8/2016, 11:29:54 PM·6 votes·815 views

I just dodged a game because a 3 man premade decided that picking Aatrox sounds fun and I get no say in it because I am a filthy solo player. Now I have to wait to start another game, having little else to do I decided to saltrant about Rito catering to premades over solo players. I should be good to start another game now.

Thanks Rito.

10 Comments

Milodic Mellodi8/9/2016, 12:22:49 AM3 votes

It's total bull that they even made Majority in the first place. Why not just make it normal percentages, like a thrice-voted Champ would be 60% and ONLY 60. 4 votes=80. That kind of thing. Not "oh two people want to play Soraka and a third is hovered over Soraka but hasn't locked in, guess we're going to play "How many kills can EVERY GODDAMN CHAMP get before we surrender?"

Gibberwatt8/8/2016, 11:38:32 PM1 votes

well, I think rito wanted teh gamemodes to be a learning experience, where we all try new champs in weird games. For that reason, I have decided that I love both rumble and zac, with no previous experience, other than one4all. Try some new stuff. You won't always get your way.

Truly not Gay8/8/2016, 11:40:01 PM1 votes

What is your beef with Aatrox? He is actually pretty good in one for all. It is pretty much a guaranteed win if you are fighting squishies.

Itankyou8/9/2016, 12:09:56 AM1 votes

Players can play whatever champ they want in ANY role they want. Stop being toxic about it and carry your games u solo q cuck