If you would like to prove that someone is a weak player, what could you do to prove it? What kind of stats, what kind of behaviour would be? How could you do it?
Eedat2 votesHonestly this comes across as you looking for reasons to flame people lol
Neosphoros1 votesHonestly this comes across as you looking for reasons to flame people lol
No, this is not my reason. Simply I would like to prove that players which system selecting to my teams are noobs and it is impossible to win a game created in that way.
DrCyanide3 votes... well, that's awkward, because the advice I was about to give was "they'll look for other reasons they lost the match instead of looking for what they could have done better."
Inkling Commando2 votesYou don't. You just leave them alone. They don't need you flaming at them for their poor playing skill.
Neosphoros1 votes[{quoted}](name=Inkling Commando,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=iV4Tb6kH,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-01-07T23:17:05.014+0000)
You don't. You just leave them alone. They don't need you flaming at them for their poor playing skill.
If you do not understand, I will write it in different way.
If you would like to prove that players selected by system to your team are noobs (and if it is a true) what proof what would/could you like to give to show that they are not same experienced as you (or your teammates) or enemy and becouse of that - you have been puted on a lost position.
Simply... what would be a universal determinant to prove it?
Live2LetDie1 votesDepends on role: CS is huge for laners, Kill participation for supports/wards, objectives for junglers/KP, damage for carries, towers/tank for top. Just a few i can think of