Having **TONS** of deaths legally states you're inting. (Change my mind)
The title is sarcastic people, and I give no fucks for down-votes. Many of the people in this community would rather act like they are all-knowing Gods, who don't need to know the definition of the word Intentionally (deliberately; on purpose)
But somehow make their own definition that goes something like: Doing something they weren't intending to do, but due to its nature, you can decide weather or not it is in-fact intentional, ignoring the definition of the word you throw around like candy.
Most people hate inting Sion build, and aside from Riots standpoint on it being positive, and supporting, he CAN be stopped. Riot is seemingly ok with the build contrary to its title, because most matches you load into are full of people that not only forget the objective of the match, but quite LITERALLY forget the objective during the match. PSA: "IT IS NOT I REPEAT NOT TEAM DEATH-MATCH, YOU HAVE TO DESTROY THE OBJECTIVES TO WIN THE GAME." Going for Baron or Dragon when you've aced the team, have a nexus turret, and a half left/have nexus left/ when the entire enemy team is up is literally thee most useless thing you could do if you could just end the match! And in the case of going for Baron/Dragon when the entire enemy team is up. . . I'm sorry, could you fucking not?
Asking "Not to end, because I'm almost done with my build" is literally thee most useless/obvious sign you are NOT objective oriented. For fucks sake people, Inting Sion is a damned wake-up call! He's more objective oriented than most people I see on either teams in a match, and if he's winning, HE'S CLEARLY DOING SOMETHING RIGHT! (If you can't connect the dots, I'll type it out: He's destroying the objectives.)
"The OBJECTIVE is to destroy the opposing team's main structure with the assistance of periodically-spawned computer-controlled units that march forward along set paths. Player characters typically have various abilities and advantages that improve over the course of a game and that contribute to a team's overall strategy."
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplayer_online_battle_arena
If Sion's team isn't cooperating, they aren't being aggressive, and they are choosing to passively sit back, scatter away from each other, and Sion is rushing a lane, the entire enemy team (1v5, even 1v4) can take him out.
I'm up for debate on Current Sion, but literally believe everything above Sion statement is sound, obvious statements.
EDIT: If you are going to down-vote the thread, at least grow a pair, and post a comment. Or not. Probably the player who plays strictly for kills. Shrugs
