I just don't understand why we can't have 10 bans off the bat.

LegendmakerGX··2 votes·486 views

Over 100 champion but rarely even 70% of them are played since they are not in meta/strong or just plain weak and can not play to the ability of new champion/rework champion who have better mechanic then the old tier champions.

I am tired of seeing champions that are annoying to deal with because they either are just way to strong or they are overloaded compared to the classic champions that Riot dished out back in season 1-4. If Riot actually think a little and say "Hey if we give each team 5 bans each then wouldn't people start learning more champion pool or diversity rather then have 5 champion they would pick out of in each lane?" I hate having to deal with Vayne Yasuo LeeSin Vi because they are so strong but I really can't do anything about it unless my team mate agree to ban these guys or wish the enemy bans them for me.

over 100 CHAMPIONS and we can only ban 3 for each side? Even Dota 2 has people who are smart enough to allow them to ban 10 champion. P.S This won't fix the problem of course not but at least it will ease players problem where they have to lane against something as a Vayne who IE/Static and prob 3-5 hit any ADC.

3 Comments

NoPaxt2 votes

I think you should reduce bans to ZERO... Force the community to learn to counter play these so called "broken" champions.

Once you get 10 bans, you'll be wanting 12, once a new champion is released...

420 grams1 votes

If Vayne and Lee sin and yasuo are so strong, how come every game with one of them they have a 70% chance of feeding?

FireDrizzle1 votes

Caitlyn Cassiopeia Hecarim Karma LeeSin Riven Ryze Twitch Vayne ZyraSyndra All need to be banned if no one on your team is playing them, so how about 20 bans? Or some actual balance. You can't really ban your counters and let some of them through...

More from Gameplay

More by LegendmakerGX