Champion Diversity At Worlds Isn't Bad
Despite what most people think, the diversity is actually not bad this year. I have seen threads with lots of thumbs up from sheep, I'd like to call them. Some threads saying there has never been diversity at worlds, or threads like "another year at worlds, no diversity".
Correct me if I'm wrong, but last year at worlds there was over 70+ unique champions played out of the 130+ champions in the game. That's actually a big number, in fact, a little way too big.
This year isn't too bad, and keep in mind, this is still the group stage and early on. You can't expect 100+ unique champions to be played the first week at worlds and stuff. People were already criticizing the diversity the first day....Really people?
I'm sure there will be a gangplank pick thrown in, aurelion sol, azir possibly, maybe even more. Even then, so far, the worlds diversity isn't as bad as people think.
Am I the only one? Also, the worlds seems more enjoyable, and it seems like most teams have a good solid chance to win (unless your splyce) but that's beside the point.


are all perfectly viable at this level of play as well.
has been banned a fair bit, too.




in half of games
Honorable mensions