Add more bans Riot.

Kip Killagin··42 votes·1,818 views

Next patch better have more bans RITO

20 Comments

Butthurt5 votes

I think next season should definitely have more bans.

They really should just introduce the Dota style of drafting (Funny enough that was what the original plan was for LoL anyway). It goes:

4 bans (2 each side) - 4 picks (2 each side) - 4 bans - 4 picks - 2 bans - 2 picks.

This is a much more dynamic and interesting way to have the drafting phase go, imo. It allows for flexibility in team comps just in case they ban they character you want or need for the comp.

More bans in general = more variety. Tired of seeing the same 10 champions every single competitive game? Well if Riot added in 2 more bans per side the variety would go up like crazy! No more Kalistas or Thresh's or Rek'Sais in competitive! People would be forced to play outside of their comfort zone and whatnot. But yes, there is the issue of banning all one role, but that just simply adds more variety! If a team were to ban Hecarim, Maokai, Lulu, Rumble, and Gnar suddenly BOTH teams would have to pick a 'non-meta' top laner. I think it would be nice seeing some Garen top in a competitive game, or Riven or someone that isn't a tank...

I'm kind of going on a tangent now, and I'm sure these words won't be heard by Riot (sure they've heard them a million times). And I'm not even sure if this forum post is serious or not, but I felt like sharing this opinion even if it was or wasn't.

arc954 votes

i think adding 2 more bans wouldn't be a bad idea since the champion pool is growing so much.

LOL Spammer4 votes

Why? I don't think we need anymore bans.

ChargeItDownMid4 votes

[deleted]

LOL Spammer2 votes

No it will go a long way to decrease the number of viable champions therefore increasing play of non-viable champions. But this will also mean that a lot of the viable champions will not be playable because they will always be banned.

ChargeItDownMid1 votes

[deleted]

LOL Spammer1 votes

But what do you do when a champion you want to play that is in tier 1 is banned 100% of the time?

Mandang04 votes

With how long Riot's let it go so far, we should ask for at least 5 bans a side. Never know when Riot will allow us more bans after this hypothetical chance.

LatetotheRace3 votes

Right now, we have about 6-8 REALLY over powered champions (kat, zed, sej, hec, vi, gnar) (and nid is actually on the lower priority atm) so I think either riot working on balancing super bruisers, or adding more bans yes.

Raptamei3 votes

Add 4 more bans and allow every player to ban one champion before picking.

Goes well with the very long overdue role queue in ranked.

Occams Raiser2 votes

There should be 4 bans at least. one for each source. Jungle, top, bot, and mid. Each person getting to say who they don't want to lane against.

Dunkrius2g2 votes

8 bans in total would save my lp more. ↑↑↑↑↑

Keevalroy2 votes

I still think everyone should get 1 ban, but I can live with 4 per side. As long as there's more bans, I don't care.

Lysdexic12 votes

Honestly who needs extra bans right now? theres only like 4 champions right now who should be banned, because this is the best meta ever! Almost everyone is viable with very few being overpowered

TurquoiseYoshi1 votes

I think, for solo and duo queue, both teams should have 5 bans, with each player getting to choose one. That way, each player gets their preference on a ban. For built teams, they could either get one more ban each or just the same 6, because they should be communicating on who to ban.

Kosm1K1 votes

yeah, definitely need more bans. As time goes on, the ban pool has to increase just as much as the champion pool, proportionally speaking. there are over 100 champs, it's time

Slamurai Jack1 votes

I feel like adding more bans just gives people more reason to QQ when the champ they hate isn't banned.

More from Gameplay

More by Kip Killagin