I love how champions with no mana do more damage then champions that do have mana
That makes alot of sense
That makes alot of sense
I love how people post things without evidence or examples
that makes a lot of sense
Enough said... LOL he hurts man..
His damage is limited to procced passive while small, and then beast mode does a lot. But its a small window
he has high damage in both forms just that you have to maintain difrent distances and moniter how much damage you take in small form
So, if you're playing a champion without escapes, you can get completely perma-slowed by boomerangs while you're in his AA range while slowed. That "procced passive" is far too easy to hit unless you plan on wasting cleanse or something to get away. The only champ I've ever managed to avoid a Gnar chase on was old GP because of his W and E...
Not saying its a piece of cake but its not all that hard to dodge. Minion wave mostly stops it. Once he throws you engage with most ant top its a won trade and he prolly misses it and it goes in long cooldown
does more.
I love how people post things without evidence or examples
that makes a lot of sense
Pantheon has high mana costs and his damage is laughable compared to Garen's.
on the other hand pantheon has a gap closer which stuns, an undodgeable ranged ability and a long range ultimate, while garen is limited to the 400 unit radius around him.
on the other hand pantheon has a gap closer which stuns, an undodgeable ranged ability and a long range ultimate, while garen is limited to the 400 unit radius around him.
Pantheon has High Mana Costs and Gnar does more damage than him
Pantheon has High Mana Costs and Gnar does more damage than him
Because Pantheon wouldn't be a pick ban champ if he had no mana costs.
"Just dodge his Qs :B" "Just survive till he goes oom :B"
20% cdr Pantheon with no mana costs. gg 90% of top laners.
Because Pantheon wouldn't be a pick ban champ if he had no mana costs.
"Just dodge his Qs :B" "Just survive till he goes oom :B"
20% cdr Pantheon with no mana costs. gg 90% of top laners.
The fact of the matter is that mana is supposed to be a gate. It's supposed to limit how much damage you can do. Why some people are privileged with having no mana gate but still doing balls amounts of damage I don't know
Because they have their own weaknesses. I'm not sure how you don't grasp this concept.
cool story
Okay, Gnar, while really strong and a really safe top lane pick has his own issues that keep him from getting too out of hand. Like the timing of his rage bar, immobility in Mega-Gnar form, the fact you can play around his hyper procs to avoid the majority of his damage output when he's in mini-Gnar form, oh and when he transforms you can see it coming from a mile away. Really good Gnar players minimize these weaknesses, and maximize his strengths through solid play, but that's part of being a good player.
i only have a problem with his %max health damage, and scalings
Because mana isn't the ONLY gate. It's a gate, but far from being the sole one. Theres also range, regeneration, base stats, scalings, etc.
gnar also has 3 hit passive and ranged poke to go with it
Kits are hardly comparable by static damages, but lets give that comparison a shot.
Q- boomerang throw 125 damage +115% AD plus slow 10 second cooldown (2 if cought)
Q- Spear Shot 225 damage +140% Bonus AD 4 second cooldown
W- hyper 50 damage + 14% of targets HP +100% AP after 3 marks
W- Aegis of zeonia 150 damage +100% AP plus stun 9 second cooldown
E- Hop 180 damage +6% of max HP plus slow 12 second cooldown
E- Heartseeker strike 106 damage +120% of bonus AD 6 second cooldown
Since gnars ultimate doesnt have a damage in mini form I wont count pantheons ult aswell.
its true that mega gnar is stronger than pantheon, but mega gnar is a window of opportunity and is meant to make it more powerful than other champions.
As you can see, on the surface pantheons abilites, that cost mana, have more damage while also having lower cooldowns.
also, I dont think 45, 55 and 65 can be considered "high mana costs"
Pantheons mana pool is really, really small. Play him, he goes oom all the time even without spamming skills too much.
Panth is pretty weak this meta. Try Darius.
Riven and
like who?
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
is currently overpowered so this isn't a fair one to compare
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
is currently overpowered so this isn't a fair one to compare
this one it isn't true for
YOU GOT ONE
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
YOU GOT TWO
YOU GOT THREE
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
so to recount you got 3 champions 

a few of these champions you might argue do so lets see the ones that i consider a reasonable argument
ok so
she is a very high damage champion who no one can truly outdamage in a teamfight thats her thing. she is also very prone to CC
hes got the best burst in the game no one can kill a squishy faster however he has no teamfight presence
she can duel basically anyone that cant kill her before she gets her combo off however she has no teamfight presence and is only good at dueling
after her nerfs she can barely 1v1 most squishies
typical assassin basically the same burst as
he can easily be outdamaged by the likes of
and
great teamfigher, his ult does amazing damage but nothing else, cant duel very well and after his ult he loses all of his damage
so you got 3 champs that this is true for #imbored
ha more than half this list has high damage just because they have some counter parts that have mana doesnt mean that they arnt doing high damage themselves
she can duel basically anyone that cant kill her before she gets her combo off however she has no teamfight presence and is only good at dueling
I DISAGREE! Almost all of her skills do some form of AOE damage plus her stun plus her AOE Ranged Execute. Plus every Riven builds Ravenous Hydra anyway. No team fight presense. Pfft.
Riven either builds glass cannon with very little tankiness and dies to CC, or builds bruiser-y and doesn't have enough damage to kill anyone as long as the tanks are competent. She can snowball hard, but a fed anyone has good teamfight presence by virtue of having much higher presence in general than anyone else.
[{quoted}](name=Musashi 001,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=9hul6JTI,comment-id=00020001,timestamp=2015-09-21T08:23:54.927+0000)
I DISAGREE! Almost all of her skills do some form of AOE damage plus her stun plus her AOE Ranged Execute. Plus every Riven builds Ravenous Hydra anyway. No team fight presense. Pfft.
I laughed when they said no team fight presence also.
like who?
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
is currently overpowered so this isn't a fair one to compare
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
is currently overpowered so this isn't a fair one to compare
this one it isn't true for
YOU GOT ONE
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
YOU GOT TWO
YOU GOT THREE
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
so to recount you got 3 champions
a few of these champions you might argue do so lets see the ones that i consider a reasonable argument
![]()
![]()
![]()
ok so
she is a very high damage champion who no one can truly outdamage in a teamfight thats her thing. she is also very prone to CC
hes got the best burst in the game no one can kill a squishy faster however he has no teamfight presence
she can duel basically anyone that cant kill her before she gets her combo off however she has no teamfight presence and is only good at dueling
after her nerfs she can barely 1v1 most squishies
typical assassin basically the same burst as
![]()
he can easily be outdamaged by the likes of
![]()
and
![]()
great teamfigher, his ult does amazing damage but nothing else, cant duel very well and after his ult he loses all of his damage
so you got 3 champs that this is true for #imbored
Silver I player thoughts... You are the reason why people don't like low division players to talk about balance. Your list is so bad...
You can skip all this bullshit and jump right into last one to see how well "informed" you are, when you state that Yasuo can't duel or that his ult is his "dmg".
hurts.
hurts more.
has a cancer ult without any cost.
ARGUMENT=OVER
hurts.
hurts more.
has a cancer ult without any cost.
ARGUMENT=OVER
sure they hurt but not as much as champs with mana
Which is the drawback to being resourceless/energy-using.
EDIT: Should be.
Vlad isn't as bursty as many champs that do use mana.
Rumble, once again, isn't bursty the way many champs that use mana are.
Insec falls off and struggles to carry late game. Plus, it's hilarious to watch people screw up his ult and throw a fight with it. I wouldn't want to take that away by adding on a mana bar.
Rumble's damage output is mitigated by his Overheat bar. Vlad uses life as resource. Lee Sin is blind. They all have their own set of balances that aren't mana, so what is the point of all this?
People are saying that mana sets certain champions back. You just made a super good point in that they have their own monitoring and resources. (and then there's Kat)
Also the amount of people that try to copy Insec has gotten to the point where I call everyone who plays him by that name. It's honestly kind of sad watching them try. xD
TL;DR: There's not really a point.
.... And then there's Kat, indeed.
like who?
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
is currently overpowered so this isn't a fair one to compare
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
is currently overpowered so this isn't a fair one to compare
this one it isn't true for
YOU GOT ONE
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
YOU GOT TWO
YOU GOT THREE
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
this one it isn't true for
so to recount you got 3 champions
a few of these champions you might argue do so lets see the ones that i consider a reasonable argument
![]()
![]()
![]()
ok so
she is a very high damage champion who no one can truly outdamage in a teamfight thats her thing. she is also very prone to CC
hes got the best burst in the game no one can kill a squishy faster however he has no teamfight presence
she can duel basically anyone that cant kill her before she gets her combo off however she has no teamfight presence and is only good at dueling
after her nerfs she can barely 1v1 most squishies
typical assassin basically the same burst as
![]()
he can easily be outdamaged by the likes of
![]()
and
![]()
great teamfigher, his ult does amazing damage but nothing else, cant duel very well and after his ult he loses all of his damage
so you got 3 champs that this is true for #imbored
Most of the "isn't true" are actually true
Most of the "isn't true" are actually true
like which ones?
late game can almost instaburst an adc, idk what you're talking about
[{quoted}](name=NyX Reks,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=9hul6JTI,comment-id=00020005,timestamp=2015-09-21T15:21:43.986+0000)
late game can almost instaburst an adc, idk what you're talking about
low quality b8
Katarina doesn't do shit for damage on even items without resets, plus you can interrupt her ult or walk away from it.
Go into a lane and qwe and try to trade with them without dodging their abilities, you'll see that as far as straight damage is concerned she sucks if she's not ahead or diving on someone who's low hp.
Kindred has mana costs but some of her costs are sooo low.. its almost liek she is a mana less champion.. im not saying she can get too spammy, but once you get a bork on her RIP.
Kindred's costs are all too low.
30,30,0 and 100? Fuck that noise.
W is 40
E is 70
seems about right
The first time I played Kindred they were obscenely low.
Then again I was really tired so I probably read it ALL WRONG.
Who still picks a mana champ? No one got time for mana regen.
Anivia practically one shots u at level four and she has mana.
all base of skill, is your biased opinion thinking mana do less than energy, if ur smart u know energy champ has a gap between their abilities and by the time they can use their abilitys. its call punishing their mistakes when they use all their energy something low elos like you can't do.
Idk where, but i remember riot saying if they added mana to kat, they'd have to buff her damage ratios because they aren't high enough.
So there ya go
PS: Ever seen a
who did little damage? :P
Idk where, but i remember riot saying if they added mana to kat, they'd have to buff her damage ratios because they aren't high enough.
So there ya go
PS: Ever seen a
who did little damage? :P
Yes.ALOT.
I love how you made that up :D. Prove it and I'll buy you a mystery gift