Do you guys really want to play against Nami/Soraka/Karma rather than Lulu/Janna

spooky goast··2 votes·1,450 views

If Lulu and Janna get gutted to the point of <48%~ winrate (which some people are actually calling for), then enchanter players will no longer want to play those champions. So what will they turn to? Nami Soraka Karma , which i personally think are more unfun to play against. And if youre response is "THEN GUT THOSE CHAMPS TOO", so basically you want Enchanter players to quit the game?

9 Comments

Kaìju2 votes

Healers are more balanced as they have higher costs. Nami needing 130 mana for maxed heal and Raka pay's 10% of her health per cast. Plus you can just buy GW to reduce their power. What can you do against Janna again?

Colton1472 votes

All enchanter supports are very mechanically intensive and all have high skill ceilings. Karma Nami Soraka Lulu Janna Sona

Deep Terror Nami1 votes

What exactly makes these champions unfun for you?

saltran1 votes

Champs that stops them for rolling over the enemy adc and killing him without counterplay.

Warpes1 votes

Exhausting every single effort and engage tool there is for my team only to be perma cockblocked and whittled down helplessly by shielded buffed damage, after trying to get to the ADC who was totally 100% caught out and at fault and should have died

What makes these champs fun for anyone? is a better question

saltran1 votes

For the adc that plays against a Rengar with a Janna supp, I can confirm that it is really fun.

Warpes1 votes

lol YES

how is this even a fucking question?...

KennysDreamGirl1 votes

id much rather play against champions i can damage than ones i cant touch

Dead flag blues1 votes

Because Nami and Karma actually have to hit skillshots / take some risks to do things

More from Gameplay

More by spooky goast