So about MMR (With math :D)
I havent read much about MMR so please if I get something wrong do tell. From my impression ranked mmr and normals mmr do not mix. This is a mistake. My first ranked matches were when I didnt even have runes. So I played normals for a very long time until I got both more ruins and more champions. Now I have over 700 wins in normals. So assuming each game is 3/4ths of an hour and that I have roughly the same amount of losses due to fifty fifty chance (which in reality I would have more losses due to pre level thirty games) I have roughly 1050 hours of league experience or 43 days of league playing. (talk about no life now that I have added it up)
Ok so I have a lot of experience. Why does this matter? Mostly because of who I am paired with due to my ranked mmr. Take my most recent game for example. My top laner went 55 cs for the entire thirty minute game. Less than two cs a minute. Meanwhile his laner had over 150. I cannot carry someone like that. Sorry I can't. Perhaps the argument for climbing is being able to carry but I doubt many people could. He had 130 games. Doing the same math he has 117 hours of league or 4 days of league experience.
The idea of you deserving to climb is when your teams are equal and YOU are the one that tips the scales. All your lanes theoretically go even and you are the one that makes the difference. So yes I am supposed to make the difference. But this guy further tips the scales to where I have to make even more of a difference than in a regular game. It makes it so if I theoretically had won this game I should have been compensated even further because of how much more I tipped the scale (should. not saying the lp system should be changed or complaining but theoretically should)
So for me the question remains. Why does ranked MMR seem to be completely unaffected by ranked MMR when clearly the experience gap is there? If the point of MMR is to close that gap why does it still seem to exist?