Why is Warlord's Bloodlust not usable versus jungle monsters?

darkdill·Apr 11, 2016·2 votes·1,074 views

Throws off legal early sustain?

6 Comments

AndrionarApr 11, 20162 votes

not worth, I'm to lazy to explain why.

Linna ExcelApr 11, 20161 votes

My best guess would be that it would allow some champs to jungle who probably shouldn't. Riot doesn't want everyone to jungle so if you can't do it without warlord's bloodlust, you probably shouldn't be jungling with that champ.

darkdillApr 11, 20161 votes

What if it only worked at 25% effectiveness vs jungle monsters?

Zone of EndlessApr 11, 20162 votes

{quoted}

What if it only worked at 25% effectiveness vs jungle monsters?

Probably might be too low to be even worth taking. Too high and it makes some jungler abuse it to stay on the field longer with healthier HP for easy counter jungling/dueling potential.

Just what I thought.

Linna ExcelApr 11, 20161 votes

At that point the healing would be pretty insignificant and I'd have to ask myself if it would be worth it, especially if I could get something that would help with my ganking or make me tankier as the game goes on.

Is 2 hp early on really worth giving up TLD or that one where you get HP from large mobs?

darkdillApr 11, 20161 votes

On Tryndamere it would be. On Olaf it would be.

Depends on the Champion. And I was just tossing 25% as a possible value; it could be 50% instead for melees.