They both have the double attack speed steroid problem... and i would say both falloff on a similiarly disapointing power curve.
I dont think the movespeed buff was in good taste towards improving olaf.
Do you have any current plans for him? Or are you satisfied with his power level and how it is reflected in the lcs
Dreadlocks1 votesOlaf isnt nearly in bad of a spot as Aatrox man. I think olaf is fine.
CISTERN1 votesOlaf isnt nearly in bad of a spot as Aatrox man. I think olaf is fine.
Nearly zero presence at competitive, with 45% win ratio and a bit below average popularity is not k. And please dont use arguments like zed, lee have low win ratios too, because lee and zed have a above average popularity with some presence competitive. One number dont say the truth, but the combination of numbers, is a different strory! Aatrox is at worse spot, I agree with that
Dreadlocks1 votesHey if my man TheOddOne can pull off an above 64% win with him diamond 2 - Masters then i see no problem ^^
CISTERN1 votesHey if my man TheOddOne can pull off an above 64% win with him diamond 2 - Masters then i see no problem ^^
You talk about a sample and not a statistical result! U cant base a opinion for a champion, based on one player
Dreadlocks1 votesThe same way you base yours off a bunch of bronze players (most of the player base) who lack the knowledge and ability to play a champion at its fullest potential.
edit: 48 win % in the jungle isn't bad @plat + and hes above avg or avg at everything in the champion matrix ... Idk where you are getting your data that proves Olaf is a weak champion.. but it's probably not a very good source.
CISTERN1 votesThe same way you base yours off a bunch of bronze players (most of the player base) who lack the knowledge and ability to play a champion at its fullest potential.
edit: 48 win % in the jungle isn't bad @plat + and hes above avg or avg at everything in the champion matrix ... Idk where you are getting your data that proves Olaf is a weak champion.. but it's probably not a very good source.
I said 45 with 46% win ratio at top (i dont count bronze /silver/gold), the results count only (win ratios / lose ratios), for jungle is 48% (bad too ) for a champion with low popularity, also his high win ratios at jungle happens when olaf fights vs limited sources of damage (only ad or too much ap rarely).Look at highest win ratio core built (If people pick one source of damage vs a fighter with true damage they deserve to lose)
Low popularity mean this : I pick this champ as counterpick only or i pick this champion because i mastered him, still this champion has low win ratio at jungle 48%
But yes olaf is not the most underpower champion in game, there are champions at much worse state.Olaf is just a below average champion.
Rank 148/186 at plat + with low presence competitive
Dreadlocks1 votesSooo much wrong... lol 48% win is not bad at all... holy moly
Affinity21 votesWhat makes you say that?
Im ok with listening but "olaf is fine" isnt an argument. It tells me nothing
Calabok1 votesthey're fine. There is nothing to look at.
stealthfox941 votesOlaf is fairly balanced right now.
Affinity21 votesactually i base my opinion on the collective of the rog community.... full of a heavy set of platinum to master tier players..... including myself?
pretty sure that trumps most but im not dumb enough to use that as an argument because it has no purpose in determining if olaf has a fun effective and interesting kit to be the best olaf he can be in league of legends...
Which if any of you think olaf is fun when compared to prior iterations i highly suggest you think about it, review prior riot design philosophy posts including meddlers comments on olaf and avoid posting on the forums.