I don't want to sound greedy but...

Dokkaebi·Jun 22, 2017·2 votes·541 views

there is 136 champions in the game and we can only ban 10 (there is always at least one duplicate)

23 Comments

DragfinJun 22, 20175 votes

Perfect example of the horseshit player base never being satisfied.

DokkaebiJun 22, 20171 votes

Knew there would be this one guy who comes to say shit like this on the gameplay boards.

Archlord AatroxJun 22, 20173 votes

I agree with dragfin, people on the boards complain about the pettiest stuff

DokkaebiJun 22, 20172 votes

How is it petty that you're forced to pick/ban a meta champion instead of actually being able to do that to champions you want?

LauchmelderJun 22, 20172 votes

That has nothing to do with bans. That's just the occasional horseshit balance we get. And Riot is trying to balance, just doesn't always work with 130+ champions.

DokkaebiJun 22, 20171 votes

The game will never be balanced. That's why we need bans to get the broken champions away.

DragfinJun 22, 20173 votes

{quoted}

The game will never be balanced. That's why we need bans to get the broken champions away.

No, we don't need bans at all, people need to learn to play the friggin game and adapt. It's a team game. Get that through your think skull.

DokkaebiJun 22, 20171 votes

How do you even know what bans are?

RalanrJun 22, 20172 votes

Do you know how to adapt?

Not every problem can be solved by removing it.

DragfinJun 22, 20172 votes

{quoted}

How do you even know what bans are?

I rest my case. Thanks.

RalanrJun 22, 20173 votes

Because you're not forced. You have a choice, you just think it doesn't matter.

DokkaebiJun 22, 20171 votes

Yes, I also have a choice to intentionally lose or not.

RalanrJun 22, 20172 votes

Yes. We call that feeding usually.

DragfinJun 22, 20171 votes

[deleted]

DokkaebiJun 22, 20171 votes

You have played 10 games in your life. Come here talking about a game you have just started.

The Fuzzy 0neJun 23, 20171 votes

I think that when it starts getting to a personal level of insulting that maybe it's time to step back and let the chips fall where they may. Chalk it up to inexperience or ignorance but I feel like your point has been made and that insulting them won't change their mind

RalanrJun 22, 20173 votes

Well you sound greedy.

King of DemonsJun 22, 20172 votes

There are never more than 3 or 4 "oppressive" champs at once in the game, the rest comes down to preference.

DokkaebiJun 22, 20171 votes

And people never ban them because they're either picked or people want to ban preferred champions instead.

King of DemonsJun 22, 20172 votes

That's so wrong that I refuse to argue against it.

People always ban the OP shit.

Archlord AatroxJun 22, 20171 votes

there's probably a reason why bans in norm play are vastly different than pro play.

Maddened King Jun 22, 20171 votes

"Yes, The games should be fun", "No, I dont want more diversity". Great way to make yourself look like a dumbass.

LyndrisJun 22, 20171 votes

Nah, the current ban system is fine. I ban the opponent i don't want in my lane. The list is something like so: top panth/renek. mid FIZZ, i don't jungle, bot blitz/cait