alright, here's the thing:
the dude died before minions even reached lane. His question was how to play tank fizz, and claimed he did poor because he didn't know how to play tank fizz because he kept dying to j4.
my response was that the 2-minute death put in a very bad spot, making it a possibility that the wasn't so much of a "not knowing how to play tank fizz" situation and more of a "not knowing how to play from behind, especially because his tank fizz build takes time to get rolling"
When I stated that he died at a very early time and even specifically stated that his build takes time to become efficient (where he then begins to rely on base damages), I was not being insulting. Those were an in-depth analysis of
a) what he did wrong that put him at a disadvantage
and
b) my assumption that he didn't know how the build worked, based of his general wording and the fact that he died several times early in the laning phase
I wasn't being "deliberately antagonistic", if I was I would've called him names or been sarcastic in some manor. I would've brought up irrelevant facts while not providing any insight whatsoever. What you call "deliberately antagonistic" is actually "bluntly factual", which is exactly what I was being. Just because he was offended due to me calling out his errors and providing a new perspective to his situation doesn't mean his feelings were warranted.
He asked for help, and I gave it to him. He took it as me calling him a feeder and being useless because he didn't want to adopt the perspective that I provided. Not my fault and not my issue.
Also: When you call someone "deliberately antagonistic" while being sarcastic with the exaggerated language
We would all greatly appreciate that effort from ya buddy. Thanks.
while also telling them how to behave
but try to have a little more class, respect, and maturity in your future posts.
seems a bit hypocritical. I'm not mad, just something to watch out for in your future posts if you're gonna white-knight (and no, that's not an insult)