The Way Riot is Talking About Urgot...

...You'd think he's a combination of , , and .

The reality, however, is that the majority of the community would much prefer his spammable q over the unreasonable, overdone, and flat-out unnecessary mobility we see in quite a few champions (Seriously, can somebody explain how kalista's passive fits with her theme at all? Unless the theme is "CertanlyT", it has absolutely no place in her kit or anyone else's). The only champion that falls into this category that was nerfed was , and even so, his kit is still overloaded as all hell.

But no, I'm wrong, 's passive is balanced, has more oppressive mobility and damage than and deserved to get nerfed into the ground, and has a high amount of counterplay (Come on, if you can't lock her down in that 0.1-second window when she q-w-w's, you're a fucking scrub who deserves to lose).

You want to rework Urgot? That's perfectly fine. But the audacity of calling him "unfun" to play against when there exist some champions that many within the community would love to see flat-out removed from the game is one of the single most infuriating things to me that someone from this company has ever said or done.