After many demands for chat logs upon my chat restriction, I've gotten a response. Here is the amazing toxicity I was punished for with the full logs:
[0:51] Me: waiting on potion
[3:21] Me: 3 troll promo games ina row
[5:29] Me: cant dos ht
[5:59] Me: no man, normalyl its no sissu3e
[6:04] Me: he got that lucky kill and hes snowballing
[6:17] Me: dangerous game saved him
[6:45] Me: you dare to talk?
[6:54] Me: lolll
[6:56] Me: yes you did
[7:04] Me: and you were also lane
[7:05] Me: late
[7:10] Me: shes 0 1
[7:38] Me: yeah i get turret dived
[7:40] Me: nothing i can do
[7:44] Me: you want me to stop then come here
[9:01] Me: you fed him almost as much
[9:11] Me: you talk after being late to lane??/ seriously
[9:12] Me: muted
[9:20] Me: yes due to dangerous game
[9:24] Me: and then he snowbalsl
[9:34] Me: you are the kind of player Tribunal was made for
[9:51] Me: im amazed you're not chat restricted yet
[10:04] Me: msut be someone else's account hoenstly
[11:05] Me: gonna get turret divd soon
[11:12] Me: will die 100%
[11:38] Me: annie, maybe carry if you're gonna talk sht at the very least
[11:59] Me: yup, it's called snowballing
[12:05] Me: did you even watch? i died in less than 1 sec
[12:14] Me: you're almost the same score and had jg help
[12:18] Me: muted
[12:23] Me: finally got around to it
[12:28] Me: you're not even ranked well
[12:44] Me: i have 64% winrate as singed and it's just an unlucky game from that first kill
[12:55] Me: rengar snowballs harder than lb
[13:01] Me: if she says anything of value, tell me
[13:04] Me: otherwise, i keep her muted
[13:06] Me: pure cancer
[13:28] Me: probabyl some loser teengage kid so not worth wasting time on
[13:39] Me: just trying to make himself feel important by talking sht
[13:43] Me: pathetic really
[15:21] [All] Me: i'm the only one that died to him, and I def. got any help at all when i said he 1 shots me now
[15:39] [All] Me: it's all off that 1 kill without trade due to dangerous game and he just snowballs after
[15:48] [All] Me: all the other deaths were basically under turret
[16:27] [All] Me: and i have to deal with nonstop annie harass too... most toxic player I've ever seen... dares to talk after being late
[16:35] [All] Me: good thing I muted
[16:48] [All] Me: welcome to my world
[17:06] [All] Me: he could do that basically after 1 kill
[17:16] [All] Me: lol he was
[17:21] [All] Me: i got turret dived 4x lmao
[17:23] [All] Me: he did
[17:34] [All] Me: ask him
[17:50] [All] Me: any jg help ever could have traded some of those
[18:38] [All] Me: unless I have ult and can react, i get 1 shot
All things considered this isn't the most toxic chat log I've seen. However that's why you only received restrictions and not a game ban. The issue here is that you keep arguing and putting down other players. Calling them cancer and losers is not helping you win the game and it isn't helping them improve their behavior.
Here is my response to Riot:
I see little that merits a report there (in context) or is violating ToS.
All I see is opinions and responses to harassment from toxic players (which would be evident if the statements were presented in context). For example "you fed him almost as much" is clearly a response to someone accusing another player of feeding an enemy carry. "probabyl some loser teengage kid so not worth wasting time on... just trying to make himself feel important by talking sht... pathetic really" is a response to a player harassing our whole team, intentionally feeding and later afking. Note, I did not even call him a loser but merely stated a likelihood based on observed behavior so that the team stops focusing on him and plays the game instead. And yes, I stand by calling this sort of behavior pathetic. It is an opinion with a firm foundation. "3 troll promo games ina row" is a reaction to getting DCs or incredibly one-sided games. "you dare to talk?" is a response to a player harassing our team after being DC for 10 minutes.
These are either factual statements or opinions. There is nothing inherently toxic in any of these statements unless Riot believes thought control is a good thing and that I am not allowed to express opinions. It's not even retaliation. Retaliation would be akin to person A stating: you're an idiot and then me responding "you're a dipshit" etc. I guarantee I've been called an idiot many times in those chat logs and yet at no point, did I respond likewise. A lot of this is merely describing reality and explaining my course of action. For example:
[13:01] Me: if she says anything of value, tell me
[13:04] Me: otherwise, i keep her muted
[13:06] Me: pure cancer
A player is harassing me and I'm asking the team to relay any potentially useful information. I also describe the atmosphere created by this player as "pure cancer." This is my opinion and I believe if the chat logs for said player were included, you'd agree. I see absolutely nothing wrong with this.
I am allowed to express opinions and I see not a shred of evidence that I violated anything in ToS or was even toxic. Some of these are negative statements but that is merely a reflection of reality not for the sake of bringing people down. Negative attitude is more applicable to people typing "gg surrender" after first-blood etc., not when we have a person harassing us, intentionally feeding and then afking. You can't pigeonhole all negative statements as negative attitude when the circumstances are not equivalent.
At no point did I call anyone a bad player, idiot, etc. or initiate any sort of quarrel. The only negative statements that were even presented are obviously in response to toxic players and negative situations (merely descriptions of reality).