Meaning: if you are 1v2 and kill both enemies, you get the full gold (or maybe even a little more). If instead you are 5v2 and kill both enemies, you get way less gold.
This way outplays are still rewarded, but 5 man ganks have less reasons to happen (they still lead to a secure kill+tower, it just is worth less to leave the rest of the map undefended).
Timethief491 votesBeeing less rewarding for teamplay seems kinda stupid imo.
Disulfiram1 votesTeamplay should not end at getting a few early kills and snowballing from there.
Timethief491 votesWell both sides can do it, so the one doing it better should be rewarded. Teamplay is a skillpart. Beeing more skilled should be more rewarded.
Disulfiram1 votesThe objective of the game is "destroy the enemy nexus", not "get 50 kills"... teamplay should revolve around working together for the main objective, not "let's just pick a few early kills, then who has more just steamrolls everything and takes every objective at once".
OP Champions1 votesSo if jg ganks bot the support should just use his cc and run as far away as he can? Punished for good rotation and teamplay? Does not seem right to me at all
Disulfiram1 votesNo, but to make it worth they have to stay and take the tower or dragon too, else it would be worth little, and the time spent bot for the gank+objective would open a wider window for making plays top.
Kuwabaramulberry1 votesYeah. Thats a good idea in theory, and I'm glad someone is at least throwing out ideas. But in practice, it would probably feel like a punishment to roam or for a jungler to help his lanes, and would end up with farming junglers like Yi showing up 30 minutes in and wiping teams.
Disulfiram1 votesIt would be a punishment for roaming for the kills and leaving without taking objectives. (Yi still would have terrible early objective control.) To sum it up: Gank, get 2 kills, leave -> not worth Gank, force the enemies out, get objective (dragon, tower, whatever) -> still worth