A 54.5% win rate is the wrong line to draw for champs needing nerfs.

Dope Solo·Apr 28, 2019·2 votes·946 views

No wonder this game is so bad.

8 Comments

HP CrookshanksApr 28, 20192 votes

A champion's pick rate, ban rate and difficulty also matters.

boricCentaur1Apr 28, 20191 votes

Win rate has never been a reason to nerf champion since it's not a reason since it ONLY means how much a champion wins nothing more nothing less.

LegacyDAPApr 28, 20191 votes

Then if that's how you feel Riot's nerf philosophy should still make you upset.

boricCentaur1Apr 28, 20191 votes

Name me one patch where the reason to nerf a champion was winrate?

LegacyDAPApr 28, 20192 votes

Riot Repertoir just posted a graph on twitter based on winrate and banrate that they use for basis on what is worthy of a nerf.

https://twitter.com/RiotRepertoir/status/1121824617344028672

Done25Apr 28, 20191 votes

{quoted}

Riot Repertoir just posted a graph on twitter based on winrate and banrate that they use for basis on what is worthy of a nerf.

https://twitter.com/RiotRepertoir/status/1121824617344028672

Pick rate probably also factors in. A champion with a 0.2% pick rate is probably only being chosen as a counter pick or used by one tricks. A 20% pick rate champion shouldn't be doing as well as the 0.2% picks, as they're probably used in less optimal situations or by people who don't main that champion.

boricCentaur1Apr 28, 20191 votes

AGAIN GIVE ME A TIME WHERE RIOT HAS USED IT AS A REASON. There not using it as a reason here there using it as a indicator those are two different things especially when riot has took nerfs and buffs off pbe due to other factors.

Light BurnerApr 28, 20191 votes

{quoted}

Win rate has never been a reason to nerf champion since it's not a reason since it ONLY means how much a champion wins nothing more nothing less.

Thats the reason everyone gives to nerf zed yasuo vayne riven (somehow jinx slid by without this treatment i wonder why?)