Some thought about on-hit effects

Lets have shrex·10/3/2018, 10:17:54 PM·1 votes·741 views

Hey all. I just got this idea coming through my head about on-hit effects (both the ones on a single aa like item 3147 item 3057, and the others like item 3124 item 3153 )

What if instead of applying the damage all at once, each auto-attack would proc the next item in your inventory ?

Let's say you're Zed Your inventory is like this item 3147 item 3095 item 3142 item 3111 item 3078 (hypothetical build, I know Zed doesn't build like this, don't downvote just because you saw this here)

You R someone, you AA the person, your AA procs item 3147, you AA again, your second AA will proc item 3095, your third AA will proc item 3078 Not worth to have another item using an on-hit effect on an assassin right ? Wouldn't it actually prevent this assassin from buying item 3095 and bursting someone with a single AA ? It also goes for MissFortune Graves

Now second instance :

You'reKogMaw Your inventory is as such item 3124 item 3153 item 3085 item 3006 item 3091 (Once again, I know this probably isn't a proper Kog'maw build, just shh and keep following)

You have 2.50 attack speed, and your AA will proc in order : 1st AA : item 3124 2nd AA : item 3153 (but life-steal is still applied to others AA) 3rd AA : item 3091 4th AA : item 3124 5th AA : item 3153 6th AA : item 3091 Etc...

Mentionning that item 3086 items wouldn't be counted towards this "mechanic". With item 3124, it would simply trigger 2 effects at once. Mentionning that obviously, the stats from the items will still count, and item 3124 would still stack upon each auto.

Would it actually solve the issue about on-hit build being impossible to itemize against, and allowing these champions to be meta again without breaking it ? This way, a single AA wouldn't : > Burst insane damage from 500 effects stacked in a single auto > Deal way too much damage, shredding tanks, but also squishies because of a lot of effects stacked in the AA, dealing physical, magical and %hp with each auto-attack.

Thoughts on that one ?

0 Comments