Isn't Katarina more of a problem then Ekko?

Chris Chiaki·Jun 1, 2015·7 votes·697 views

35% banrate and almost 54% winrate in Plat+ Elo. Ekko has a similar banrate but a much lower winrate.

So even the supposed high ELO players can't just CC her because you know what there's other threats on the team and unlike other champions, she doesn't get punished for feeding in lane because of insane AP ratios and base damages.

Your AD carry can 1v1 if he only has but if they don't have hard CC they'll get shit on by Katarina.

Assassins and other midlaners like have been shat on with nerfs while Katarina gets minor "nerfs" so she's become strong without many noticing.

She may not be OP perse but her kit is toxic in that players aren't punished for losing lane like other champions. I can't think of another champion that can feed their ass off and still be a huge threat, maybe but he actually requires skill and heat management not a head and a keyboard.

2 Comments

ShuffledPancakeJun 1, 20153 votes

QQ Thread op, ekko is countered by hard cc so is kat, basically same champ one is faceroll the other is intelligent faceroll. Ekko's win rate is around 45% - 50% right? its always 1 ekko on each team if they arent banned so it has to be like that right?. Just get over those 2 champs.

MLDzXnRRRJun 1, 20153 votes

Katarina is just accepted, Ekko is new. She is more of a terror in a blind pick and teambuilder matches, where people want to just chill and play for fun, but suddenly have to deal with Pentarina...