Now stop complaining about lack of diversity.
More than half of the champion pool was used, it's obvious certain champions fit better into certain comp or are just slightly worst than others, it's impossible to have all equal.
Can we stop complaining about lack of diversity due to meta and other stupid complaint we see at least 10 times a day on the forum ?
Xelvi17 votesIt's funny that 'OMG HALF' is being touted as a good amount of diversity.
Says it all really.
BetaDude401 votesRelative to last year's Worlds, it's improvement.
I mean, it's probably not likely we'll see every single champ played in one Worlds event, but we'll see.
2yordles1cupcake13 votesYep bet that shit scripted just so riot could save face. If people didnt complain then you probably wouldve been seeing the same 12 champs being picked in world.
diversity my butt
Ferezilla3 votesYour username is fitting.
Remlap12233 votesGreat counteragument. I bet you completely changed that guy's moral philosophy to the very specific detail.
Fraggleroc13 votesThere's still room for improvement. Almost half have not showed up.
... and Dota 2 (although it's a different game all together)... says hello.
Anidan7 votesOnly 6 heroes went unused at TI5 (DotA2) :\
Lissama11 votes
are permabanned/picked.
Nice diversity, dude.
Abyssphere6 votesThe amount of bitterness in this thread is ridiculous. Of course there's still room for improvement - the point is that this is a great step towards that. People complain that we see the same 30-40 champions at Worlds and this year we've seen more than 70. That's a pretty big deal even if it could still get better.
Awkward Couch1 votesThank you!
dEAdbUs5 votesWe've seen same amount in all previous seasons (around 50% of whole champion pool): http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/esports/V0WsriPU-champs-seen-at-worlds-a-list
Plus as always 20 champions were played/banned in 100% games, while other were played 1-2 times.
Earl Eulrich5 votesthough it´s sort of the same thing Dota had at TI5...it´s all fun and games early on, but quarterfinals onwards get dominated by 5-7picks. Worlds has shown some serious balance issues this year, more so than the last years. It had been a very fun groupstage with all the changes coming in, but now that a new meta is established it just shows that they really did a horrible job balancing things out with the worlds-patch (and it really somewhat did hurt the enjoyablity of the tournament, guess i´m not the only one not interessted in the finals anymore).
Awkward Couch2 votesI blame a majority of the balance issues to the juggernaut patch right before worlds.
thumbnail94 votesYeah now what % of those champions occupy more then 65% of all the games?
dEAdbUs4 votesBut everyone was used just once, while 10 champs were played in 100% games. Nice diversity.
SymbolicFear3 votesExactly, not to mention the champions that had at least 90% ban rates
Mael bro3 votesWhere the fuck is 
? Diversity my ass. Riot only favor LC$ Big plays type of champs 
. trolololololololololololololololololololololololololol
Enosetc3 votesWhere the fuck is
do people actually want yorick to be played in his current state
has no one ever played against yorick
does no one remember how horrible it feels to lane against him
Mael bro2 votesdo people actually want yorick to be played in his current state
has no one ever played against yorick
does no one remember how horrible it feels to lane against him
Since when Yorick is viable in this meta ? lol it can't be worse to lane against him than 
or any other point and click bs.
Praise the Son1 votesYorick is pretty oppressive but I've always just played Cho into him lol. Btw Cho hasn't been played in worlds either... In fact, 51 champions still have not seen play in worlds (yet). Some of these champions make sense 
however, many of the other champions not seeing play are actually quite good, some of which were buffed before worlds
and some who had formerly been super meta picks like 
The Bearded Bard1 votesI'm really surprised Yorick isn't seeing a rise in play with all of these popular late game adc champs and lane bully top laners. Yorick is someone I see surviving a lane vs fiora, darius, garen, gnar, etc and still being useful especially with the rise of late game hyper adc champs like Vayne, Trist, and Jinx. Yorick ghost with Vayne gets silver bolts, Trist gets hyper range, and Jinx gets the long range aoe if you use it on her while she has Q on.
SymbolicFear2 votesOut of those 71 champions, how many differences were there in the top lane? How about bot lane? Mid and Jungle are the only roles that aren't really affected by the meta as much.
RedCyclone1 votesOnly tank supports with a splash of Soraka and Morg though Allround diversity is better, but some key spots really need work
WarlockLaw1 votesIsn't that still an improvement, wasn't last world's support picks tank supports and Morg. That's like one whole new champion in the role
Blade of Justic1 votesWhat if it was the complaining that caused this to happen?
N3mO061 votesOk, but all I see in my games is: 
Divewing1 votesThat's in professional play. In solo Q we are all seeing the same crap over and over and over again. Part of the reason theres so much diversity is there were NO COMPETITIVE GAMES PRIOR PLAYED. The closest we got was 1 or 2 LPL games, that werent even supposed to be, played on patch 5.16. The pros have an idea whats strong, but there hasnt been enough time to figure the patch out entirely, so its basically a: "lets try everything" approach
