If Urgot executes Tahm when he devours another champ, Urgot should kill both champs.

warpenguin555··72 votes·3,008 views

Even if Tahm ate one of Urgots allies. Lets make this thing as brutal as possible, no cutting corners.

33 Comments

Jinzo Torrance64 votes

Let's add a Kalista that ulted a Tahm that ate a Thresh whose lantern is being picked up by an ally. All 4 should die.

warpenguin55528 votes

^ This guys gets it

Eternal79114 votes

XD. If I saw this happen I would die of laughter.

PhDs Nuts17 votes

{quoted}

XD. If I saw this happen I would die of laughter.

Pentakill

Eternal7911 votes

XD

ImTheSideKick5 votes

stuff like this needs to happen

FlameHalbrdOkido1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Cinquino Show,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RoBkvey2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2017-07-08T19:32:49.016+0000)

Let's add a Kalista that ulted a Tahm that ate a Thresh whose lantern is being picked up by an ally. All 4 should die.

Don't forget about Kayn being able to hide inside enemy shadows now 2! But they can't do that b/c of game Health and it would encourage the Tahm trolls more

GankLord3 votes

Don't forget to add a Shen teleport ult

Gear5Luffy6 votes

Also Kayn ur teammate who has ulted kalista

EinarUlfar10 votes

I second the "make this thing as brutal as possible". Was not a fan of Urgot before; can honestly say I'm very excited for the rework to release.

THE RlVER KlNG5 votes

No that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard

It exclusively punishes a champion for doing their job with no counterplay this is a terrible idea

Kill the Tahm, sure, kill the one he ate - whichever one who actually got lured. Not both.

Xion The XIV1 votes

There is also no counter play for when Tahm eats someone and Ryze ults both of you into the enemy fountain.

THE RlVER KlNG2 votes

That's a pretty narrow and specific situation and not at all comparable to what the OP is suggesting

You alright bud?

Xion The XIV2 votes

[{quoted}](name=THE RlVER KlNG,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RoBkvey2,comment-id=000700000000,timestamp=2017-07-09T21:07:08.639+0000)

That's a pretty narrow and specific situation and not at all comparable to what the OP is suggesting

You alright bud?

Were you hear on his release? 9/10 times with a Tahm on your team you were either getting thrown into fountain/thrown into enemy team/ulted into fountain.

Same thing happened with the ryze rework. Even now there are trolls that try to kill any many as possible with his ult into fountain.

Automated Riven1 votes

Except to not get eaten??

Xion The XIV1 votes

How can an ally not get eaten?

Automated Riven1 votes

There is also no counter play for when Tahm eats someone and Ryze ults both of you into the enemy fountain.

If tahm eats someone and then ryze ults them into the fountain I dont understand how an ally is complaining about counterplay. This senario would be assumed to be from an enemy who got eaten and ryze ulted into the fountain which caused him to die. to which he complained 'no counterplay' to which I replied, Dont get eaten.

Allies has no part of this conversation.

Unless this is a complaint about getting trolled by teammates. In which case there are far bigger problems then counterplay.

Autrah Fang1 votes

[{quoted}](name=THE RlVER KlNG,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RoBkvey2,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2017-07-09T12:57:56.701+0000)

No that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard

It exclusively punishes a champion for doing their job with no counterplay this is a terrible idea

Kill the Tahm, sure, kill the one he ate - whichever one who actually got lured. Not both.

can't the ally click to get out of Tahm's stomach early? then there's the fact that they can only be in Tahm's stomach for a certain duration. all you'd have to do is get spit out before Tahm gets you both executed. at that point it would be the ally's fault for letting themselves get killed with him ._.

Edit: granted, if Tahm ate his ally then got immediately executed (for instance because he was in melee range of Urgot), then you have a point :3

Nanuk Pihoqahiak2 votes

I actually really like this lol.

ModCaptainMårvelous2 votes

In a more balanced state, when Tahm is executed after eating someone, they should emerge with a red tinge to their character.

"Brush with Death: Good lord, how horrifying!"

Automated Riven2 votes

All for one. The tahms all eat each other and urgot gets a Penta.

Aptest1 votes

If tahm eats urgot while urgot is pulling tahm's ally, tahm should eat both and his ally should live.

Eternal7911 votes

Well if he ate both that the ally would still theoretically get pulled into the meat grinder. So they wouldn't live.

IGotScuttleCrabs1 votes

Tahm gets credit for anyone that dies in him then.

Revali1 votes

can this also include teamkilling?

Shablagoo1 votes

Makes no sense

Blakiepug1 votes

Lol, as a Tahm main I'm okay with this only so long as Urgot can team kill. If it only kills Tahm's allies, then that would just be dumb. Tahm doesn't need any more nerfs.

Xion The XIV1 votes

THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN. I want to see a Polygon kill in the screen. Where Urgot somehow killed everyone in the game. We need something like this just for the hilarity of it. Make Urgot that one champion you don't want to KS for you will also die.

MunchCrunchLunch1 votes

no the kalista just gets out at where tahm died.

also if kalista ulted someone and she died. that person will appear right next to where kalista died. but unlike tahm not immediately rather at kalista ult max duration.

for the second part it used to work like that. the player does not appear immediately just a cpl seconds after kalita died. am not sure if they changed it or not.

Inting Pillow1 votes

Tryndamere can survive his ult. Fucking favoritism at it's finest.

More from Gameplay

More by warpenguin555