If Urgot executes Tahm when he devours another champ, Urgot should kill both champs.
Even if Tahm ate one of Urgots allies. Lets make this thing as brutal as possible, no cutting corners.
Even if Tahm ate one of Urgots allies. Lets make this thing as brutal as possible, no cutting corners.
Let's add a Kalista that ulted a Tahm that ate a Thresh whose lantern is being picked up by an ally. All 4 should die.
^ This guys gets it
XD. If I saw this happen I would die of laughter.
XD
stuff like this needs to happen
[{quoted}](name=Cinquino Show,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RoBkvey2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2017-07-08T19:32:49.016+0000)
Let's add a Kalista that ulted a Tahm that ate a Thresh whose lantern is being picked up by an ally. All 4 should die.
Don't forget about Kayn being able to hide inside enemy shadows now 2! But they can't do that b/c of game Health and it would encourage the Tahm trolls more
Don't forget to add a Shen teleport ult
Also Kayn ur teammate who has ulted kalista
I second the "make this thing as brutal as possible". Was not a fan of Urgot before; can honestly say I'm very excited for the rework to release.
No that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard
It exclusively punishes a champion for doing their job with no counterplay this is a terrible idea
Kill the Tahm, sure, kill the one he ate - whichever one who actually got lured. Not both.
There is also no counter play for when Tahm eats someone and Ryze ults both of you into the enemy fountain.
That's a pretty narrow and specific situation and not at all comparable to what the OP is suggesting
You alright bud?
[{quoted}](name=THE RlVER KlNG,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RoBkvey2,comment-id=000700000000,timestamp=2017-07-09T21:07:08.639+0000)
That's a pretty narrow and specific situation and not at all comparable to what the OP is suggesting
You alright bud?
Were you hear on his release? 9/10 times with a Tahm on your team you were either getting thrown into fountain/thrown into enemy team/ulted into fountain.
Same thing happened with the ryze rework. Even now there are trolls that try to kill any many as possible with his ult into fountain.
Except to not get eaten??
How can an ally not get eaten?
There is also no counter play for when Tahm eats someone and Ryze ults both of you into the enemy fountain.
If tahm eats someone and then ryze ults them into the fountain I dont understand how an ally is complaining about counterplay. This senario would be assumed to be from an enemy who got eaten and ryze ulted into the fountain which caused him to die. to which he complained 'no counterplay' to which I replied, Dont get eaten.
Allies has no part of this conversation.
Unless this is a complaint about getting trolled by teammates. In which case there are far bigger problems then counterplay.
[{quoted}](name=THE RlVER KlNG,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RoBkvey2,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2017-07-09T12:57:56.701+0000)
No that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard
It exclusively punishes a champion for doing their job with no counterplay this is a terrible idea
Kill the Tahm, sure, kill the one he ate - whichever one who actually got lured. Not both.
can't the ally click to get out of Tahm's stomach early? then there's the fact that they can only be in Tahm's stomach for a certain duration. all you'd have to do is get spit out before Tahm gets you both executed. at that point it would be the ally's fault for letting themselves get killed with him ._.
Edit: granted, if Tahm ate his ally then got immediately executed (for instance because he was in melee range of Urgot), then you have a point :3
I actually really like this lol.
In a more balanced state, when Tahm is executed after eating someone, they should emerge with a red tinge to their character.
"Brush with Death: Good lord, how horrifying!"
All for one. The tahms all eat each other and urgot gets a Penta.
If tahm eats urgot while urgot is pulling tahm's ally, tahm should eat both and his ally should live.
Well if he ate both that the ally would still theoretically get pulled into the meat grinder. So they wouldn't live.
Tahm gets credit for anyone that dies in him then.
can this also include teamkilling?
Makes no sense
Lol, as a Tahm main I'm okay with this only so long as Urgot can team kill. If it only kills Tahm's allies, then that would just be dumb. Tahm doesn't need any more nerfs.
THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN. I want to see a Polygon kill in the screen. Where Urgot somehow killed everyone in the game. We need something like this just for the hilarity of it. Make Urgot that one champion you don't want to KS for you will also die.
no the kalista just gets out at where tahm died.
also if kalista ulted someone and she died. that person will appear right next to where kalista died. but unlike tahm not immediately rather at kalista ult max duration.
for the second part it used to work like that. the player does not appear immediately just a cpl seconds after kalita died. am not sure if they changed it or not.
can survive his ult. Fucking favoritism at it's finest.