30% damage in 2,5 seconds is too much, it would be better for it to be 25% damage in 3 seconds, more room to proc means a more reliable Stormraider. It is not a buff to it's mobility, but to it's reliability.
Ralanr1 votes
It probably helps.
Cherysse1 votesNot everybody is an AD champ, but I say it mainly for the early game, you can proc DFT or TLord whenever u want, but Warlords is more "random" and Stormraider requires more "effort", it would be a bit better for it to be easier to proc, making it a better option.
Ralanr1 votesWarlords has the problem of needing crit. Few can proc it without an item.
Cherysse1 votesIn truth, but Stormraider has the problem of being dependant on Damage/Enemy HP, if the enemy is a tank you can hardly ever proc it.
Rebonack1 votesWarlords has the problem of needing crit. Few can proc it without an item.
I still think Warlord's should be a general sustain keystone rather than just being a thing for Crit users.
Have it grant some amount of damage vamp for 4 seconds upon booping an enemy champion with a reasonable cooldown.
Ralanr1 votesThen sustained champs would never use fervor.
Cowgirl Ed1 votesit is fine. actually i think it will be nerfed soon because people are starting to realize how useful and strong it is
Cherysse1 votesI don't think so, it is still unpopular, thunderlord is still being used a lot and very few persons use stormraider.
Axests1 votesI have 2 situations where i proc stormraiders
Cherysse1 votesProblem is assasins on high elo are still using TLord, and Stormraider can be sometimes hard to proc for any other type of champs, it is suposed to be also useful for Mages, also it should work diferently because you are sacrificing early poke/damage for mobility.
killd0zer1 votesnope
c ya