So 3 people picking a champion in one for all = 100% team pick still...

RainbowIcee·Nov 27, 2016·28 votes·1,358 views

cmon riot... we talked about this last time. Even if it's 1 v 4 people let that last person have their 20% chance at the champion pick.

18 Comments

PlanetWarwickNov 27, 201610 votes

No... Srsly 4 people wanna play aurelion but u wanna play yasuo so

TeCoolMageNov 27, 20166 votes

Why, though? It's like holding 4 other people hostage.

DarkRitualNov 27, 20169 votes

It's a lottery to see whose champ gets chosen.

Everyone's vote sould have an equal chance.

Awesomedude8888Nov 27, 20163 votes

The group of 4 will still play their champ 80% of all the games. Meanwhile, as a solo player I do not want to be held hostage by premades.

TeCoolMageNov 27, 20161 votes

Being a solo queue player doesn't give you special rights. When surrendering, it's a choice that has definite troll cases where premades can force a surrender in a winning competitive game, but in a game mode for fun, 4 people wanting to play one way and the 5th guy refusing to dodge so instead he makes someone else dodge / forces them to risk a 20% chance of playing a champion they're terrible at, is holding a game hostage.

Awesomedude8888Nov 27, 20163 votes

And being a premade also does not give you special rights. When surrendering, it's a choice that has definite troll cases where 2 solo players refuse to surrender a clearly lost game, but in a game mode of fun, a person wanting to play one way and some premade of 4 refusing to play one way and flames the solo player forcing the solo player to dodge or play a champ that s/he will feed on is holding a game hostage.

TeCoolMageNov 27, 20161 votes

Nope, majority rules in neutral cases. 4 man premades get as much right of way as 4 solo players wanting to play a specific way. The difference here is that the 4 man premade can agree on what they want before hand, but it's still 4 people who want one thing.

2 solo players or 4 premade players surrendering a winning game or refusing to surrender a losing game, both are troll cases so both are bad. The difference is that premade players can organize trolling, where everyone loses, while the 2 solo players are there by chance (and everyone still loses).

RainbowIceeNov 28, 20161 votes

Because that'd be fair tbh, and imagine how it feels when you're the team carry and 2 people don't wanna surrender. 2 people are holding the team hostage then and no one every complains that you need a 4 out of 5 votes to surrender.

VesemirNov 27, 20163 votes

I hate it when a 3 premade choses Ivern and i have to deal with it... Why is this a thing?

WonderlandsNov 27, 20162 votes

they do?

RainbowIceeNov 27, 20163 votes

yea in one for all if 3 people pick a champion it becomes 100% chance the other 2 pics won't matter.

9 XNov 27, 20162 votes

Yeah, so just premade with two friends and agree on a pick between them...

When it's that obvious, I just wait for the counter to hit 1 and doge.

Poorly DressedNov 27, 20162 votes

I don't mind. at least i can flame them for their garbage pick later on that i didn't want and they can't play :D

NarasimhaNov 27, 20162 votes

While that would be nice, majority rule is the way things go. It's not fair to the 4 either if you got your pick simply because of luck. Either way, someone is going to be unhappy. Might as well have it be the smaller group.