what did I say? riot is cheating

AngelooJzC·Sep 10, 2019·2 votes·1,372 views

Just as I suspected, riot intentionally ruins games After a shit load of rigged games (double unranked bot in GOLD....), I had a game with a premade. Suddenly, a perfect game : only high silvers, zero troll, and we destroy it (no, I didn't get carried, more like the opposite lol https://matchhistory.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/EUW1/4186098470/2185850441223328?tab=overview ) and just after the game, this happens : https://i.ibb.co/T2rKgmj/Untitled-1.jpg 100% free loss from the lobby. If I can predict it simply from a handful of numbers, a machine can predict it.

10 Comments

FOR JUSTICESep 10, 20195 votes

lets just ignore the fact that your team had

a gold, 2 silvers, and 2 bronze

1 gold 2 silvers and 2 provisionals

im sure it was 100% weighted against you.

Jennifer420Sep 10, 20192 votes

you know...

you may say 4 diamonds + 1 bronze vs 5 golds players = an average elo of high gold.

but its not fun/fair

FOR JUSTICESep 10, 20191 votes

{quoted}

you know...

you may say 4 diamonds + 1 bronze vs 5 golds players = an average elo of high gold.

but its not fun/fair

the OP's case isnt in that extreme, the highest elo was in fact gold 4. and that was a tie between himself and the negative winrate lucian (bounces between high silver/low gold)

Jennifer420Sep 10, 20191 votes

fair enough. but cant we stick to the rule that riot forces on premades? 1 entire division is the max difference for people to duoq with. (even less in high elo). dont give me bronze people when im gold. thats more than 4 divisions (silver 4-1) in between. i couldnt duoq with a bronze if im gold. so dont match me with randoms.

FOR JUSTICESep 10, 20191 votes

{quoted}

fair enough. but cant we stick to the rule that riot forces on premades? 1 entire division is the max difference for people to duoq with. (even less in high elo). dont give me bronze people when im gold. thats more than 4 divisions (silver 4-1) in between. i couldnt duoq with a bronze if im gold. so dont match me with randoms.

that actually, is in fact a rule ive always been behind, if i cant duoq after game then dont match me with them;

because thats one matchmaking fallacy thats always been caused by duoq imo, in order to balance out comms, but that then means they are placed in a slightly harder game, which they normally shouldnt be able to enter by a slight degree.

tbh tho the duoq penalty though isnt actually as bad as its made out to be, its most of the time within like 2-3 divisions.

Kai GuySep 10, 20191 votes

I hate that rule. The gap of player % between allowed duos is insanely high. Demotion from division 4 is difficult and a quick climb will pop your MMR out of your current division so you end up with a very large # for the gap between silver 4 to Gold 1.

Riots duoing should be restricted to Class intervals from accounts MMR not from the shifting populations of Tiers and divisions.

Effectively players use titles as a grade of skill. So gold silver yea that's fine. But if you treated the MM values with accuracy then the s4 to g1 example I gave is a gap of Bronze 1-2 vs Plat 4-3 Huge range, and MM will consider anything in-between it fair game long as it can balance out teams.

Fine if there's premade it can use, really screwy when it has to off set a teams average buy putting solo players on the other side. You can see match averages shift around way wider with duos who have a gap.

With the addition of Positional MM, I think riots going to need to address player perceptions, we use Rank as our metric for skill. So that title needs to come to accounts at lower uncertainty, or some indicator needs to be provided that we know what MMR feels some ones at if it does not reflect their ranked tier.